PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRSNX vs. DGSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSNX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than DGSFX's 1.30% return.


PRSNX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.69%
YTD
1.72%
6M
3.14%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
3.87%

DGSFX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.85%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.40%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
-0.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.72%9.31%5.60%12.77%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%1.80%
DGSFX
DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio
1.30%3.80%2.60%9.67%-15.61%-2.95%7.99%9.85%1.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSNX and DGSFX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2018

0.69

The correlation between PRSNX and DGSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRSNX vs. DGSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

DGSFX
DGSFX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
DGSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
DGSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRSNXDGSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.15

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

0.99

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.65

2.69

+12.95

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the DGSFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSNX and DGSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum DGSFX drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSNX and DGSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSNXDGSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-21.57%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-2.91%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.87%

-3.68%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-21.29%

+1.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-3.19%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.35%

-6.57%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

1.06%

-0.58%

Volatility

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) is 0.72%, while DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio (DGSFX) has a volatility of 0.91%. This indicates that PRSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSNXDGSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

0.91%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.30%

2.75%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

3.59%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

5.34%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.13%

4.87%

-0.74%

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DGSFX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRSNX vs. DGSFX - Dividend Comparison

PRSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than DGSFX's 3.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGSFX
DFA Global Sustainability Fixed Income Portfolio
3.53%3.02%4.26%4.09%1.97%1.15%1.72%3.37%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
6.64%7.87%6.36%5.08%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRSNX and DGSFX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGSFX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to PRSNX (0.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSNX dropped -19.70% vs DGSFX's -21.57%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRSNX and DGSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer