PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRSNX vs. DGFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSNX achieves a 2.16% return, which is significantly lower than DGFFX's 2.80% return.


PRSNX

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.70%
6M
1.45%
YTD
2.16%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
4.18%
ALL TIME*
5.51%

DGFFX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.93%
YTD
2.80%
1Y
5.40%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
2.16%7.28%8.77%16.74%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%4.91%
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.80%5.84%8.04%7.82%-6.09%4.91%3.59%6.64%-0.35%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSNX and DGFFX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2017

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRSNX vs. DGFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DGFFX
DGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
DGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRSNXDGFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.75

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

5.53

-3.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

24.96

-16.08

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the DGFFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSNX and DGFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than DGFFX's maximum drawdown of -12.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSNX and DGFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRSNXDGFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-12.69%

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-1.19%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.40%

-3.38%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.70%

-8.17%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.32%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.10%

-1.30%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.52%

0.24%

+0.28%

Volatility

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) and Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DGFFX) have volatilities of 0.44% and 0.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRSNXDGFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.44%

0.45%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.23%

1.51%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

2.03%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

2.43%

+1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.16%

2.59%

+1.57%

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than DGFFX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRSNX vs. DGFFX - Dividend Comparison

PRSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, less than DGFFX's 6.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGFFX
Destinations Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
6.84%5.52%6.81%4.95%3.37%4.14%4.22%4.18%3.79%2.94%0.00%0.00%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
5.21%6.00%9.32%8.39%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRSNX and DGFFX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGFFX has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to PRSNX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSNX dropped -19.70% vs DGFFX's -12.69%.

DGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRSNX and DGFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer