PRSCX vs. TRBCX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PRSCX (T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund) and TRBCX (T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - PRSCX is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TRBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRSCX returned 20.54%/yr vs 16.29%/yr for TRBCX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PRSCX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for TRBCX.

Performance

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRSCX achieves a 19.55% return, which is significantly higher than TRBCX's -3.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PRSCX has outperformed TRBCX with an annualized return of 20.54%, while TRBCX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.29% annualized return.

PRSCX

• 1D: 3.31%
• 1M: -3.85%
• 6M: 10.61%
• YTD: 19.55%
• 1Y: 38.20%
• 3Y*: 29.12%
• 5Y*: 14.74%
• 10Y*: 20.54%
• ALL TIME*: 13.58%

TRBCX

• 1D: 2.29%
• 1M: -2.45%
• 6M: -1.39%
• YTD: -3.32%
• 1Y: 5.18%
• 3Y*: 22.26%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 16.29%
• ALL TIME*: 11.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund	19.55%	24.28%	40.49%	53.77%	-35.40%	5.83%	45.94%	53.80%	-7.52%	39.38%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	-3.32%	18.78%	48.46%	49.42%	-38.57%	17.54%	34.73%	29.97%	2.00%	36.54%

Correlation

The correlation between PRSCX and TRBCX is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1993	0.85

The correlation between PRSCX and TRBCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRSCX vs. TRBCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRSCX

PRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 42
PRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
PRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

TRBCX

TRBCX Risk / Return Rank: 8
TRBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TRBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TRBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TRBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TRBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRSCX	TRBCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.20	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	0.40	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.05	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	0.22	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.45	0.65	+4.80

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the TRBCX Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRSCX and TRBCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRSCX drawdown since its inception was -85.26%, which is greater than TRBCX's maximum drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRSCX and TRBCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRSCX	TRBCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.26%	-54.56%	-30.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.17%	-17.01%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.06%	-23.08%	-7.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.19%	-43.63%	-2.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.19%	-43.63%	-2.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.52%	-8.98%	-8.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.81%	-11.28%	-18.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.75%	5.65%	+1.10%

Volatility

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund (PRSCX) has a higher volatility of 11.29% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund (TRBCX) at 5.92%. This indicates that PRSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRSCX	TRBCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.29%	5.92%	+5.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.30%	15.42%	+12.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.85%	18.58%	+13.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.35%	24.27%	+5.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.62%	22.88%	+2.74%

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRSCX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than TRBCX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRSCX vs. TRBCX - Dividend Comparison

PRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.64%, more than TRBCX's 5.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRSCX T. Rowe Price Science And Technology Fund	9.64%	11.53%	9.43%	0.00%	7.83%	33.69%	13.90%	10.91%	36.03%	13.21%	3.68%	18.51%
TRBCX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund	5.43%	5.25%	18.16%	3.49%	5.87%	9.38%	1.19%	0.36%	2.44%	2.94%	0.67%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRSCX and TRBCX in my portfolio?

PRSCX and TRBCX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRSCX or TRBCX?

PRSCX has higher volatility (11.29%) compared to TRBCX (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRSCX dropped -85.26% vs TRBCX's -54.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.