PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRUX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRUX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly lower than PTDIX's 7.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRRUX having a 10.15% annualized return and PTDIX not far ahead at 10.47%.


PRRUX

1D
0.32%
1M
2.17%
YTD
7.05%
6M
6.65%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
10.15%

PTDIX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.24%
YTD
7.44%
6M
7.73%
1Y
18.65%
3Y*
17.08%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
10.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
7.05%12.94%15.08%21.03%-15.14%16.51%13.46%20.38%-9.28%20.19%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.44%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRUX and PTDIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.96

The correlation between PRRUX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRUX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRRUX
PRRUX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PRRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRRUXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.56

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

11.38

-2.69

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRUX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRRUXPTDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.90

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.60

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.76

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.48

+0.25

Drawdowns

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRUX drawdown since its inception was -28.85%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRUX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRUXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-54.38%

+25.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.40%

-7.32%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-13.05%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.08%

-25.43%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.85%

-30.02%

+1.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.33%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-7.49%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.64%

+0.37%

Volatility

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund (PRRUX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRUXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

2.92%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

7.87%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.63%

9.84%

+0.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

13.49%

-0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.64%

13.83%

-0.19%

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRUX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRRUX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

PRRUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than PTDIX's 9.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRUX
Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund
1.58%1.69%1.40%1.75%13.51%11.30%1.54%7.54%15.23%5.04%0.80%2.32%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.12%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PRRUX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTDIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to PRRUX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRUX dropped -28.85% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PTDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRUX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer