PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRRTX vs. URFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRRTX achieves a 2.41% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PRRTX has underperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 5.74%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


PRRTX

1D
0.67%
1M
-0.40%
6M
2.53%
YTD
2.41%
1Y
6.60%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
5.74%
ALL TIME*
6.47%

URFFX

1D
1.41%
1M
0.64%
6M
9.62%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.41%8.59%6.18%15.42%-7.91%6.89%5.46%13.40%-6.22%13.50%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
13.05%19.35%11.86%18.12%-15.66%17.70%10.52%20.16%-9.01%19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PRRTX and URFFX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.92

The correlation between PRRTX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRRTX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRRTX
PRRTX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
PRRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
PRRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

URFFX
URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRRTXURFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.35

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.87

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

12.30

-6.03

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRRTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRRTX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRRTX drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRRTX and URFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRRTXURFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.59%

-44.25%

+27.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-7.89%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.20%

-14.14%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.71%

-23.76%

+12.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.59%

-29.97%

+13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.17%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-5.88%

+3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.84%

-0.82%

Volatility

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund (PRRTX) is 1.66%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that PRRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRRTXURFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.93%

-1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.59%

9.82%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.69%

11.86%

-6.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.17%

13.97%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.25%

14.33%

-7.08%

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRRTX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRRTX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

PRRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than URFFX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRRTX
Putnam RetirementReady 2030 Fund
2.09%2.14%2.57%2.66%10.69%8.38%1.54%3.76%7.57%2.95%0.73%2.72%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.72%6.46%2.61%3.39%11.40%8.13%6.25%11.76%10.21%5.55%3.91%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PRRTX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URFFX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PRRTX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRRTX dropped -16.59% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRRTX and URFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer