PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRQZX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRQZX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly higher than PADLX's 4.61% return.


PRQZX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.37%
YTD
11.93%
6M
11.28%
1Y
26.75%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.28%
10Y*
11.88%

PADLX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.68%
YTD
4.61%
6M
4.49%
1Y
12.72%
3Y*
10.18%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PRQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund
11.93%20.82%14.46%19.48%-17.10%18.74%13.28%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.61%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PRQZX and PADLX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.85

The correlation between PRQZX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRQZX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRQZX
PRQZX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PRQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRQZXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.55

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.63

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.83

15.62

-1.78

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the PADLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRQZX and PADLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRQZX drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, which is greater than PADLX's maximum drawdown of -18.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRQZX and PADLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRQZXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-18.87%

-12.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-3.63%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.05%

-6.63%

-8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.52%

-18.87%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.26%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.67%

-4.80%

+0.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.84%

+1.18%

Volatility

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund (PRQZX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX) at 1.83%. This indicates that PRQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PADLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRQZXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

1.83%

+2.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.86%

3.90%

+5.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

4.79%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.54%

6.69%

+7.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

7.51%

+7.54%

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRQZX has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRQZX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

PRQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than PADLX's 4.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.95%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRQZX
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund
4.04%3.32%4.06%1.91%2.28%4.95%1.09%3.44%5.51%2.83%2.38%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, PRQZX and PADLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRQZX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to PADLX (1.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRQZX dropped -31.79% vs PADLX's -18.87%.

PADLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRQZX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer