PRPIX vs. SMARX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX).
PRPIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 1995. SMARX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 3, 2005.
Performance
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPIX T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund | -0.95% | 11.87% | 3.20% | 8.81% | -17.71% | -0.76% | 7.87% | 15.77% | -3.05% | 6.58% |
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | -0.30% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 9.76% | -11.77% | 0.76% | 6.55% | 7.77% | -1.13% | 4.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRPIX achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly lower than SMARX's -0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PRPIX has underperformed SMARX with an annualized return of 2.89%, while SMARX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.34% annualized return.
PRPIX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -0.95%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 8.14%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
SMARX
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- 1.98%
- 10Y*
- 3.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRPIX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SMARX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRPIX vs. SMARX — Risk / Return Rank
PRPIX
SMARX
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRPIX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.83 | 1.14 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 1.63 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.20 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | 1.89 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.06 | 6.07 | +2.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRPIX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 1.14 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.39 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.41 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRPIX and SMARX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Dividend Comparison
PRPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.71%, more than SMARX's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRPIX T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund | 8.71% | 8.26% | 5.18% | 4.13% | 2.42% | 5.61% | 3.82% | 5.47% | 3.47% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 4.23% |
SMARX Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust | 4.71% | 5.02% | 4.07% | 3.85% | 3.53% | 2.57% | 3.35% | 4.19% | 4.55% | 4.20% | 4.87% | 5.24% |
Drawdowns
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRPIX drawdown since its inception was -24.24%, smaller than the maximum SMARX drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPIX and SMARX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRPIX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.24% | -47.07% | +22.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.59% | -2.63% | -0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.24% | -16.20% | -8.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.24% | -16.20% | -8.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.80% | -1.99% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -7.02% | +3.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.82% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PRPIX vs. SMARX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Corporate Income Fund (PRPIX) and Brandes Separately Managed Account Reserve Trust (SMARX) have volatilities of 1.72% and 1.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRPIX | SMARX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.66% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.92% | 2.56% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 4.03% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.57% | 5.12% | +1.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 4.37% | +1.64% |