PRPFX vs. MMNIX
PRPFX (Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio) and MMNIX (Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - PRPFX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Permanent Portfolio, while MMNIX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by Miller. Over the past year, PRPFX returned 23.88% vs 9.63% for MMNIX. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. PRPFX charges 0.81%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for MMNIX.
Performance
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRPFX achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly higher than MMNIX's 3.56% return.
PRPFX
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 6.99%
- 6M
- 10.01%
- 1Y
- 23.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
MMNIX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 9.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 6.99% | 28.78% | 19.76% |
MMNIX Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I | 3.56% | 10.04% | 9.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRPFX and MMNIX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2024 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRPFX vs. MMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRPFX
MMNIX
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) and Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I (MMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRPFX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 6.22 | -4.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 11.57 | -9.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 2.87 | -1.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 20.96 | -17.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.59 | 89.98 | -81.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRPFX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 6.22 | -4.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 5.57 | -4.76 |
Drawdowns
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRPFX drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than MMNIX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPFX and MMNIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRPFX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -0.49% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -0.46% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | 0.00% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -0.06% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 0.11% | +2.78% |
Volatility
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Volatility Comparison
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I (MMNIX) at 0.40%. This indicates that PRPFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRPFX | MMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 0.40% | +2.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.23% | 1.11% | +10.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 1.56% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 1.74% | +9.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 1.74% | +8.88% |
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRPFX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than MMNIX's 1.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRPFX vs. MMNIX - Dividend Comparison
PRPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than MMNIX's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMNIX Miller Market Neutral Income Fund Class I | 4.75% | 5.03% | 4.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRPFX Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio | 3.05% | 3.27% | 1.86% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 2.05% | 5.38% | 4.69% | 6.90% | 2.14% | 0.95% | 7.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRPFX and MMNIX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRPFX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to MMNIX (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRPFX dropped -27.16% vs MMNIX's -0.49%.
MMNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.22 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRPFX and MMNIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer