PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRPDX vs. PRPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Permanent Portfolio Fund Class A (PRPDX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PRPDX having a 6.90% return and PRPFX slightly higher at 7.00%.


PRPDX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.05%
YTD
6.90%
6M
8.94%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*

PRPFX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.06%
YTD
7.00%
6M
9.07%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
21.60%
5Y*
11.62%
10Y*
11.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRPDX
Permanent Portfolio Fund Class A
6.90%28.45%19.06%11.69%-5.71%10.58%18.51%18.92%-6.45%10.35%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
7.00%28.78%19.36%11.96%-5.48%10.87%18.80%19.20%-7.02%10.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PRPDX and PRPFX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

1.00

The correlation between PRPDX and PRPFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRPDX vs. PRPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRPDX
PRPDX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PRPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

PRPFX
PRPFX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PRPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PRPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Permanent Portfolio Fund Class A (PRPDX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRPDXPRPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.87

2.91

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

8.05

-0.16

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRPDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the PRPFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRPDX and PRPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRPDXPRPFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.90

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.06

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.80

+0.26

Drawdowns

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRPDX drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, smaller than the maximum PRPFX drawdown of -27.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRPDX and PRPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRPDXPRPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.87%

-27.16%

+6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-8.10%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.22%

-8.19%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.67%

-15.49%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.35%

-4.28%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-3.52%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.93%

+0.02%

Volatility

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Volatility Comparison

Permanent Portfolio Fund Class A (PRPDX) and Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio (PRPFX) have volatilities of 2.64% and 2.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRPDXPRPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.64%

2.64%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

11.21%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.45%

12.45%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

11.05%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.79%

10.61%

+0.18%

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRPDX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PRPFX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRPDX vs. PRPFX - Dividend Comparison

PRPDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than PRPFX's 3.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRPDX
Permanent Portfolio Fund Class A
2.90%3.10%1.61%1.20%1.30%1.86%5.26%4.49%7.57%1.97%0.00%0.00%
PRPFX
Permanent Portfolio Permanent Portfolio
3.05%3.27%1.86%1.39%1.58%2.05%5.38%4.69%6.90%2.14%0.95%7.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PRPDX and PRPFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRPFX has higher volatility (2.64%) compared to PRPDX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRPDX dropped -20.87% vs PRPFX's -27.16%.

PRPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRPDX and PRPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer