PRNT vs. IVV
PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRNT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Total 3D-Printing Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRNT returned -8.04%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for IVV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
PRNT vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.
PRNT
- 1D
- -3.14%
- 1M
- 10.65%
- YTD
- 13.07%
- 6M
- 13.65%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- -8.04%
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
PRNT vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 13.07% | 6.70% | -8.72% | 13.37% | -40.26% | 8.99% | 40.18% | 13.06% | -17.81% | 18.03% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRNT and IVV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between PRNT and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
PRNT vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRNT
IVV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PRNT
IVV
Industrials
PRNT
IVV
Healthcare
PRNT
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
PRNT
IVV
Basic Materials
PRNT
IVV
Consumer Defensive
PRNT
IVV
Communication Services
PRNT
-
IVV
Energy
PRNT
-
IVV
Financial Services
PRNT
-
IVV
Real Estate
PRNT
-
IVV
Utilities
PRNT
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRNT vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
PRNT
IVV
PRNT vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRNT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 2.39 | -1.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 3.25 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 3.17 | -2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 14.71 | -11.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRNT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 2.39 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.83 | -1.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.45 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
PRNT vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRNT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.10% | -55.25% | -10.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.22% | -8.89% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.00% | -18.75% | -13.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.91% | -24.53% | -33.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.78% | -0.76% | -48.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.96% | -10.78% | -21.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 1.91% | +3.89% |
Volatility
PRNT vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that PRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRNT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 2.87% | +5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.01% | 8.90% | +8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.26% | 11.80% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 16.88% | +9.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 18.05% | +8.69% |
PRNT vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRNT vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.80% | 2.16% | 0.01% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRNT and IVV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRNT has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 5-year performance, IVV leads with 13.88% vs -8.04% for PRNT. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVV has performed better with a 13.88% return vs -8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.69% for PRNT.
PRNT is categorized as Technology Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRNT and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer