PRNT vs. IBID

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PRNT (ARK The 3D Printing ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRNT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Total 3D-Printing Index, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PRNT returned 16.72% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRNT charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.

Performance

PRNT vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.

PRNT

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -3.97%
• YTD: 8.58%
• 6M: 8.32%
• 1Y: 16.72%
• 3Y*: 3.25%
• 5Y*: -9.14%
• 10Y*: —

IBID

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	8.58%	6.70%	-8.72%	10.70%
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	1.94%	5.66%	4.71%	2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and IBID is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.03

The correlation between PRNT and IBID shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 22
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 21
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

IBID

IBID Risk / Return Rank: 95
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRNT	IBID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	3.19	-2.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	5.38	-4.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.72	-0.58
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	7.20	-6.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.81	29.14	-26.33

PRNT vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and IBID.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	IBID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-1.28%	-64.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-0.55%	-16.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-50.82%	-0.55%	-50.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.04%	-0.22%	-31.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.96%	0.13%	+5.83%

Volatility

PRNT vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) has a higher volatility of 9.74% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that PRNT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	IBID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.74%	0.35%	+9.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.46%	0.86%	+17.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.04%	1.23%	+21.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.19%	2.24%	+23.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.78%	2.24%	+24.54%

PRNT vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRNT vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than IBID's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF	3.68%	4.43%	4.24%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.72%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRNT and IBID in my portfolio?

PRNT and IBID have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRNT or IBID?

PRNT has higher volatility (9.74%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNT dropped -66.10% vs IBID's -1.28%.

Which ETF is better, PRNT or IBID?

On 1-year performance, PRNT leads with 16.72% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRNT or IBID?

Over the 1-year period, PRNT has performed better with a 16.72% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRNT or IBID?

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PRNT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRNT or IBID?

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 0.72% for PRNT.

What is the main difference between PRNT and IBID?

PRNT is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. PRNT tracks Total 3D-Printing Index, while IBID tracks ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: ARK and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PRNT and 0.10% for IBID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.