PRNT vs. CHAT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT).

PRNT and CHAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PRNT is a passively managed fund by ARK that tracks the performance of the Total 3D-Printing Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2016. CHAT is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on May 17, 2023.

Performance

PRNT vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRNT vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	-8.53%	6.70%	-8.72%	6.79%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	4.90%	49.85%	30.98%	19.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNT achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 4.90% return.

PRNT

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -9.58%
• YTD: -8.53%
• 6M: -11.41%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: -3.32%
• 5Y*: -12.29%
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: 4.72%
• 1M: -3.19%
• YTD: 4.90%
• 6M: 3.42%
• 1Y: 82.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRNT vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNT has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

CHAT

Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF

PRNT

ARK The 3D Printing ETF

Return for Risk

PRNT vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRNT

PRNT Risk / Return Rank: 20
PRNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
PRNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
PRNT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PRNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PRNT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRNT vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRNT	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	2.42	-2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.58	3.04	-2.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	1.42	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.31	4.94	-4.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.98	13.74	-12.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRNT vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNT Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNT and CHAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRNT	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	2.42	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	1.27	-1.24

Correlation

The correlation between PRNT and CHAT is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PRNT vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

PRNT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than CHAT's 2.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PRNT ARK The 3D Printing ETF	0.86%	0.78%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.07%	0.80%	2.16%	0.01%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	2.72%	2.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PRNT vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNT drawdown since its inception was -66.10%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNT and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRNT	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.10%	-31.34%	-34.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.22%	-16.28%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.57%	-6.73%	-51.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.59%	-5.61%	-25.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.46%	5.85%	-0.39%

Volatility

PRNT vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ARK The 3D Printing ETF (PRNT) is 7.88%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 13.21%. This indicates that PRNT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRNT	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.88%	13.21%	-5.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	23.24%	-7.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.89%	34.27%	-9.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.03%	29.27%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.74%	29.27%	-2.53%