PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRNHX vs. OIGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRNHX achieves a 10.69% return, which is significantly higher than OIGAX's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PRNHX has outperformed OIGAX with an annualized return of 13.63%, while OIGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.74% annualized return.


PRNHX

1D
2.25%
1M
-4.46%
6M
5.43%
YTD
10.69%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
-1.40%
10Y*
13.63%
ALL TIME*
9.94%

OIGAX

1D
2.95%
1M
-0.75%
6M
1.45%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
10.78%
3Y*
6.46%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
5.74%
ALL TIME*
7.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRNHX
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund
10.69%3.27%8.80%21.35%-36.96%9.96%58.05%56.50%3.79%31.59%
OIGAX
Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A
3.51%15.86%-1.85%20.93%-27.31%10.38%22.11%28.62%-19.53%26.61%

Correlation

The correlation between PRNHX and OIGAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 1996

0.63

The correlation between PRNHX and OIGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRNHX vs. OIGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRNHX
PRNHX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PRNHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRNHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRNHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PRNHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRNHX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

OIGAX
OIGAX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
OIGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OIGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
OIGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
OIGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
OIGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNHXOIGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.09

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.59

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.65

1.89

+2.76

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRNHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the OIGAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRNHX and OIGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRNHX drawdown since its inception was -70.96%, which is greater than OIGAX's maximum drawdown of -67.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRNHX and OIGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNHXOIGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.96%

-67.43%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.12%

-14.61%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-19.51%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.37%

-40.41%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

-40.41%

-7.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.73%

-2.86%

-11.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.36%

-17.23%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

4.51%

-0.78%

Volatility

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund (PRNHX) and Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A (OIGAX) have volatilities of 5.67% and 5.73%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNHXOIGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

5.73%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.83%

15.98%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.50%

18.42%

+3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.93%

19.27%

+5.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

18.40%

+4.56%

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRNHX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than OIGAX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRNHX vs. OIGAX - Dividend Comparison

PRNHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.71%, less than OIGAX's 42.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OIGAX
Invesco Oppenheimer International Growth Fund Class A
42.55%44.04%11.27%11.59%0.00%13.52%14.72%0.84%1.08%0.59%1.02%0.87%
PRNHX
T. Rowe Price New Horizons Fund
10.71%11.85%9.82%0.00%4.72%17.09%13.67%23.46%13.94%8.27%5.77%7.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRNHX and OIGAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OIGAX has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to PRNHX (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRNHX dropped -70.96% vs OIGAX's -67.43%.

PRNHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRNHX and OIGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer