PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRN vs. XAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRN vs. XAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 45.08% return, which is significantly higher than XAR's 14.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRN having a 19.03% annualized return and XAR not far behind at 18.43%.


PRN

1D
-3.57%
1M
6.97%
YTD
45.08%
6M
39.29%
1Y
65.87%
3Y*
36.27%
5Y*
20.84%
10Y*
19.03%

XAR

1D
-0.92%
1M
1.55%
YTD
14.20%
6M
10.14%
1Y
37.38%
3Y*
33.41%
5Y*
16.10%
10Y*
18.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
45.08%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
14.20%46.15%23.32%23.79%-5.02%2.31%6.18%39.33%-4.58%33.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and XAR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011

0.74

The correlation between PRN and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRN
XAR

Industrials

78.2%
99.3%

Technology

20.4%
0.7%

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Energy

1.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

PRN
78.2%
XAR
99.3%

Technology

PRN
20.4%
XAR
0.7%

Basic Materials

PRN
1.8%
XAR

-

Energy

PRN
1.6%
XAR

-

Consumer Cyclical

PRN
1.2%
XAR

-

Financial Services

PRN
0.1%
XAR

-

Communication Services

PRN

-

XAR

-

Consumer Defensive

PRN

-

XAR

-

Healthcare

PRN

-

XAR

-

Real Estate

PRN

-

XAR

-

Utilities

PRN

-

XAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRN vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XAR
XAR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAR Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
XAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRNXARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.68

2.18

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

6.08

+9.26

PRN vs. XAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is higher than the XAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and XAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRN vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and XAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRNXARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.88%

-46.37%

-13.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.15%

-17.22%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.78%

-19.73%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-32.40%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

-46.37%

+10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-5.89%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.82%

-6.78%

-4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.31%

6.16%

-1.85%

Volatility

PRN vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) at 10.65%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRNXARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

10.65%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.35%

23.46%

+0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.47%

27.98%

+2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.41%

23.69%

+1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.38%

24.74%

-0.36%

PRN vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRN vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than XAR's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.08%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%
XAR
SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF
0.29%0.40%0.66%0.54%0.50%0.83%0.63%0.75%1.19%0.76%1.09%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRN and XAR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to XAR (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs XAR's -46.37%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 19.03% vs 18.43% for XAR. On fees, XAR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XAR has been the lower-risk option at 10.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 18.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XAR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

XAR has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.08% for PRN.

PRN is categorized as Momentum, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.35% for XAR.

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRN and XAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer