PRN vs. VFMO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. PRN is passively managed, while VFMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRN returned 18.48%/yr vs 13.91%/yr for VFMO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMO.

Performance

PRN vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 28.56% return, which is significantly higher than VFMO's 21.55% return.

PRN

• 1D: -2.58%
• 1M: -8.24%
• 6M: 18.73%
• YTD: 28.56%
• 1Y: 43.53%
• 3Y*: 28.59%
• 5Y*: 18.48%
• 10Y*: 16.81%

VFMO

• 1D: -1.90%
• 1M: -2.72%
• 6M: 14.19%
• YTD: 21.55%
• 1Y: 36.16%
• 3Y*: 24.40%
• 5Y*: 13.91%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRN vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	28.56%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.91%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	21.55%	17.39%	26.14%	16.25%	-12.84%	19.16%	31.36%	28.22%	-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and VFMO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.87

The correlation between PRN and VFMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	VFMO
Industrials	65.7%	24.7%
Technology	22.7%	17.5%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	6.4%
Energy	1.6%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	1.5%	8.7%
Financial Services	1.2%	6.5%
Communication Services	-	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.5%
Healthcare	-	22.9%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

PRN vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 56
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VFMO

VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 65
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRN vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRN	VFMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.58	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	2.12	-0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	3.31	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	11.68	-2.58

PRN vs. VFMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the VFMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and VFMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRN vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than VFMO's maximum drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and VFMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	VFMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-36.77%	-23.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.55%	-10.98%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-24.40%	-6.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	-25.80%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.55%	-7.12%	-7.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.81%	-7.70%	-3.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.80%	3.10%	+1.70%

Volatility

PRN vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 13.86% compared to Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) at 8.65%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	VFMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.86%	8.65%	+5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.01%	18.17%	+7.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.16%	23.00%	+9.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.80%	22.00%	+3.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.58%	23.66%	+0.92%

PRN vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMO's 0.13% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRN vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than VFMO's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.09%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF	0.60%	0.82%	0.72%	0.89%	1.72%	0.81%	0.45%	1.22%	0.70%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and VFMO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, PRN and VFMO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PRN or VFMO?

PRN has higher volatility (13.86%) compared to VFMO (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs VFMO's -36.77%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or VFMO?

On 5-year performance, PRN leads with 18.48% vs 13.91% for VFMO. On fees, VFMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMO has been the lower-risk option at 8.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or VFMO?

Over the 5-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.48% return vs 13.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or VFMO?

VFMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or VFMO?

VFMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.60%, compared with 0.09% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and VFMO?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.13% for VFMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.