PRN vs. SEIM

Last updated Aug 3, 2026

PRN (Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF) and SEIM (SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds. PRN is passively managed, while SEIM is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRN returned 25.97%/yr vs 26.24%/yr for SEIM. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PRN charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIM.

Performance

PRN vs. SEIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than SEIM's 15.26% return.

PRN

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: -8.35%
• 6M: 11.82%
• YTD: 23.45%
• 1Y: 34.52%
• 3Y*: 25.97%
• 5Y*: 16.85%
• 10Y*: 16.36%
• ALL TIME*: 12.07%

SEIM

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: -2.14%
• 6M: 12.15%
• YTD: 15.26%
• 1Y: 25.77%
• 3Y*: 26.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF	$11.92M	$11.20M	$10.20M
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF	$5.57M	$6.94M	$5.12M

PRN vs. SEIM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF	23.45%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-3.16%
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF	15.26%	20.20%	39.12%	16.25%	-5.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PRN and SEIM is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.84

The correlation between PRN and SEIM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PRN vs. SEIM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRN	SEIM
Industrials	73.1%	3.4%
Technology	21.9%	29.5%
Consumer Cyclical	2.5%	7.2%
Real Estate	2.3%	7.2%
Energy	1.6%	11.8%
Basic Materials	1.4%	8.1%
Financial Services	1.2%	8.1%
Communication Services	-	4.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.9%
Healthcare	-	9.5%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

PRN vs. SEIM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 39
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 46

SEIM

SEIM Risk / Return Rank: 60
SEIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SEIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
SEIM Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SEIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
SEIM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRN vs. SEIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRN	SEIM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.30	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.39	1.87	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.23	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	2.40	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.15	8.72	-3.58

PRN vs. SEIM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRN Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the SEIM Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRN and SEIM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRN vs. SEIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, which is greater than SEIM's maximum drawdown of -22.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and SEIM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRN	SEIM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.88%	-22.17%	-37.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.60%	-10.07%	-14.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.78%	-22.17%	-8.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.94%	-5.49%	-12.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.82%	-3.97%	-6.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	2.76%	+3.37%

Volatility

PRN vs. SEIM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF (SEIM) at 6.28%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRN	SEIM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.11%	6.28%	+8.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.53%	15.62%	+12.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.23%	18.59%	+15.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.30%	19.18%	+7.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.88%	19.18%	+5.70%

PRN vs. SEIM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRN has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRN vs. SEIM - Dividend Comparison

PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than SEIM's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF	0.10%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
SEIM SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Momentum Factor ETF	0.55%	0.56%	0.48%	0.89%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRN and SEIM in my portfolio?

PRN and SEIM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRN or SEIM?

PRN has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to SEIM (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs SEIM's -22.17%.

Which ETF is better, PRN or SEIM?

On 3-year performance, SEIM leads with 26.24% vs 25.97% for PRN. On fees, SEIM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SEIM has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PRN or SEIM?

Over the 3-year period, SEIM has performed better with a 26.24% return vs 25.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRN or SEIM?

SEIM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRN or SEIM?

SEIM has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.

What is the main difference between PRN and SEIM?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PRN and 0.15% for SEIM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.