PRN vs. PXI
PRN (Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF) and PXI (Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PRN tracks the Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index while PXI tracks the Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PRN returned 16.36%/yr vs 7.01%/yr for PXI. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
PRN vs. PXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRN achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly lower than PXI's 32.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PRN has outperformed PXI with an annualized return of 16.36%, while PXI has yielded a comparatively lower 7.01% annualized return.
PRN
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- YTD
- 23.45%
- 1Y
- 34.52%
- 3Y*
- 25.97%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 16.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.07%
PXI
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- YTD
- 32.32%
- 1Y
- 43.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.52%
- 5Y*
- 20.85%
- 10Y*
- 7.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $11.92M | $11.20M | $10.20M | |
| $1.61M | $2.88M | $1.35M |
PRN vs. PXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | 23.45% | 13.74% | 30.35% | 37.96% | -25.09% | 25.21% | 36.39% | 34.52% | -16.19% | 22.82% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 32.32% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 5.48% | 45.85% | 75.05% | -35.91% | 1.67% | -27.56% | -8.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRN and PXI is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PRN and PXI has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PRN vs. PXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRN
PXI
Industrials
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
PRN
PXI
Technology
PRN
PXI
-
Consumer Cyclical
PRN
PXI
-
Real Estate
PRN
PXI
-
Energy
PRN
PXI
Basic Materials
PRN
PXI
Financial Services
PRN
PXI
Communication Services
PRN
-
PXI
-
Consumer Defensive
PRN
-
PXI
-
Healthcare
PRN
-
PXI
-
Utilities
PRN
-
PXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRN vs. PXI — Risk / Return Rank
PRN
PXI
PRN vs. PXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) and Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRN | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.29 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 3.22 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.15 | 8.88 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRN vs. PXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRN drawdown since its inception was -59.88%, smaller than the maximum PXI drawdown of -85.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRN and PXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRN | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.88% | -85.08% | +25.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.60% | -12.40% | -12.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.78% | -30.74% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.84% | -33.47% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.27% | -79.55% | +43.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.94% | -3.60% | -14.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -29.25% | +18.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.13% | 4.54% | +1.59% |
Volatility
PRN vs. PXI - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a higher volatility of 15.11% compared to Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF (PXI) at 7.05%. This indicates that PRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRN | PXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.11% | 7.05% | +8.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.53% | 17.89% | +10.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.23% | 22.49% | +11.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.30% | 32.81% | -6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.88% | 36.94% | -12.06% |
PRN vs. PXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PRN and PXI have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
PRN vs. PXI - Dividend Comparison
PRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than PXI's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRN Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.39% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.60% | 0.57% | 0.44% |
PXI Invesco DWA Energy Momentum ETF | 1.24% | 1.81% | 1.52% | 1.82% | 3.14% | 0.57% | 1.72% | 2.80% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.73% | 2.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRN and PXI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRN has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to PXI (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRN dropped -59.88% vs PXI's -85.08%.
On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 16.36% vs 7.01% for PXI. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PXI has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRN and PXI have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
PXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.
PRN tracks Dorsey Wright Industrials Technical Leaders Index, while PXI tracks Dorsey Wright Energy Technical Leaders Index.
PXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRN and PXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer