PRMTX vs. FGDMX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX).
PRMTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 12, 1993. FGDMX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 30, 2018.
Performance
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund | -6.86% | 43.31% | 48.75% | 39.30% | -40.90% | 9.81% | 53.69% | 35.69% | -7.57% |
FGDMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A | -6.02% | 36.36% | 35.46% | 56.40% | -38.47% | 15.63% | 35.07% | 32.77% | -7.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRMTX achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly lower than FGDMX's -6.02% return.
PRMTX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -4.04%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 6M
- 17.41%
- 1Y
- 36.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.11%
FGDMX
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- -4.96%
- YTD
- -6.02%
- 6M
- -2.94%
- 1Y
- 33.60%
- 3Y*
- 30.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRMTX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FGDMX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRMTX vs. FGDMX — Risk / Return Rank
PRMTX
FGDMX
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) and Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRMTX | FGDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.45 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.01 | 2.09 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 2.07 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.54 | 7.70 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRMTX | FGDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.45 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.72 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRMTX and FGDMX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Dividend Comparison
PRMTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 54.13%, more than FGDMX's 8.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRMTX T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund | 54.13% | 50.42% | 14.78% | 7.74% | 17.50% | 8.35% | 5.29% | 2.45% | 1.28% | 2.35% | 2.24% | 3.20% |
FGDMX Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A | 8.15% | 7.66% | 6.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.73% | 3.76% | 35.47% | 8.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRMTX drawdown since its inception was -66.30%, which is greater than FGDMX's maximum drawdown of -47.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMTX and FGDMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRMTX | FGDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.30% | -47.60% | -18.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -16.94% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.17% | -47.60% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.85% | -11.56% | +3.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.92% | -11.07% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 4.55% | -0.54% |
Volatility
PRMTX vs. FGDMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund (PRMTX) is 6.48%, while Fidelity Advisor Communication Services Class A (FGDMX) has a volatility of 8.99%. This indicates that PRMTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGDMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRMTX | FGDMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 8.99% | -2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.76% | 14.64% | +17.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.07% | 23.50% | +15.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 23.22% | +3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 24.06% | -0.53% |