PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMSX vs. VMMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMSX achieves a 32.35% return, which is significantly higher than VMMSX's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PRMSX has underperformed VMMSX with an annualized return of 8.41%, while VMMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.72% annualized return.


PRMSX

1D
1.22%
1M
12.40%
YTD
32.35%
6M
36.23%
1Y
65.36%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
8.41%

VMMSX

1D
1.46%
1M
5.99%
YTD
20.95%
6M
22.99%
1Y
48.86%
3Y*
22.11%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
32.35%32.46%-1.72%2.08%-23.35%-10.47%17.63%26.51%-16.20%42.27%
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
20.95%35.68%5.91%10.58%-18.15%-1.40%15.79%21.42%-12.53%32.01%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMSX and VMMSX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2011

0.95

The correlation between PRMSX and VMMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMSX vs. VMMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRMSX
PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VMMSX
VMMSX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VMMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VMMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRMSXVMMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.55

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.82

3.66

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.59

14.53

+5.06

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.45, which is comparable to the VMMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMSX and VMMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRMSXVMMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45

2.96

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.39

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.59

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.33

+0.04

Drawdowns

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMSX drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than VMMSX's maximum drawdown of -39.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMSX and VMMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMSXVMMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.13%

-39.28%

-31.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.56%

-13.46%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

-18.37%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.13%

-37.39%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-38.82%

-7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.12%

-13.41%

-7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.38%

-0.05%

Volatility

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund (VMMSX) at 6.08%. This indicates that PRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMSXVMMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

6.08%

+2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.33%

13.89%

+2.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.97%

16.63%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.90%

17.78%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.57%

18.38%

+0.19%

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VMMSX's 0.84% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRMSX vs. VMMSX - Dividend Comparison

PRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than VMMSX's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
0.43%0.57%0.35%1.09%1.17%8.26%0.49%1.24%0.61%0.18%0.69%0.56%
VMMSX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Select Stock Fund
1.92%2.32%3.33%3.05%3.71%6.80%1.04%2.04%2.53%1.54%1.44%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PRMSX and VMMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRMSX has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to VMMSX (6.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMSX dropped -71.13% vs VMMSX's -39.28%.

PRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMSX and VMMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer