PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRMSX vs. ESCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRMSX achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly higher than ESCIX's 8.91% return. Over the past 10 years, PRMSX has underperformed ESCIX with an annualized return of 6.31%, while ESCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.13% annualized return.


PRMSX

1D
4.15%
1M
-3.43%
6M
10.16%
YTD
18.98%
1Y
43.01%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
6.31%
ALL TIME*
7.18%

ESCIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.50%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
23.63%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
4.21%
10Y*
9.13%
ALL TIME*
6.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
18.98%32.46%-1.72%2.08%-23.35%-10.47%17.63%26.51%-16.20%42.27%
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
8.91%26.07%3.55%19.64%-24.45%11.93%43.41%15.24%-22.01%28.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PRMSX and ESCIX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between PRMSX and ESCIX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRMSX vs. ESCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRMSX
PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ESCIX
ESCIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ESCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ESCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) and Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRMSXESCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.53

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.92

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.15

17.72

-8.57

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the ESCIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRMSX and ESCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRMSX drawdown since its inception was -71.13%, which is greater than ESCIX's maximum drawdown of -48.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRMSX and ESCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRMSXESCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.13%

-48.76%

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.52%

-5.70%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.47%

-19.97%

+3.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-36.59%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.28%

-48.76%

+2.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.97%

-0.74%

-10.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.04%

-13.21%

-7.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

1.49%

+2.91%

Volatility

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund (ESCIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that PRMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRMSXESCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.68%

0.00%

+10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.65%

5.66%

+16.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.60%

10.28%

+14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.12%

15.57%

+3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

17.48%

+1.63%

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRMSX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ESCIX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRMSX vs. ESCIX - Dividend Comparison

PRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, more than ESCIX's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESCIX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund
0.42%0.91%0.00%0.56%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.11%1.66%1.16%0.00%
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
0.48%0.57%0.35%1.09%1.17%8.26%0.49%1.24%0.61%0.18%0.69%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRMSX and ESCIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRMSX has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to ESCIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRMSX dropped -71.13% vs ESCIX's -48.76%.

ESCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRMSX and ESCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer