PRKZX vs. QREARX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX).

PRKZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jun 3, 2015. QREARX is an actively managed fund by TIAA. It was launched on Oct 2, 1995.

Performance

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRKZX PGIM Real Estate Income Fund	0.93%	2.91%
QREARX TIAA Real Estate Account	0.80%	3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRKZX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly higher than QREARX's 0.80% return.

PRKZX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -7.29%
• YTD: 0.93%
• 6M: -2.48%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 5.33%
• 10Y*: 5.25%

QREARX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.41%
• YTD: 0.80%
• 6M: 1.81%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRKZX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.

PRKZX

PGIM Real Estate Income Fund

QREARX

TIAA Real Estate Account

Return for Risk

PRKZX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRKZX

PRKZX Risk / Return Rank: 17
PRKZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PRKZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
PRKZX Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PRKZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
PRKZX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QREARX

QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 99
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRKZX	QREARX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.47	5.14	-4.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.73	8.23	-7.50
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	2.91	-1.81
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.58	10.77	-10.20
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.84	45.72	-43.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRKZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 5.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRKZX and QREARX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRKZX	QREARX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47	5.14	-4.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	2.23	-1.90

Correlation

The correlation between PRKZX and QREARX is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

PRKZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PRKZX PGIM Real Estate Income Fund	7.28%	7.09%	8.63%	4.25%	5.53%	29.71%	4.27%	4.53%	5.65%	5.18%	4.96%
QREARX TIAA Real Estate Account	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRKZX drawdown since its inception was -46.95%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRKZX and QREARX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRKZX	QREARX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.95%	-1.45%	-45.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.11%	-0.37%	-9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.95%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.88%	-0.10%	-7.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.61%	-0.05%	-7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.18%	0.09%	+3.09%

Volatility

PRKZX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Real Estate Income Fund (PRKZX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.23%. This indicates that PRKZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRKZX	QREARX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	0.23%	+4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.60%	0.49%	+7.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.11%	0.75%	+12.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.44%	1.75%	+12.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	1.75%	+15.40%