PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRJPX vs. FJPCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C (FJPCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRJPX achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than FJPCX's 23.89% return. Over the past 10 years, PRJPX has underperformed FJPCX with an annualized return of 7.82%, while FJPCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.44% annualized return.


PRJPX

1D
-0.26%
1M
6.58%
YTD
11.22%
6M
14.06%
1Y
27.33%
3Y*
14.69%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
7.82%

FJPCX

1D
-0.17%
1M
7.30%
YTD
23.89%
6M
24.21%
1Y
42.46%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRJPX
T. Rowe Price Japan Fund
11.22%32.21%6.13%2.02%-27.37%-11.03%34.60%27.56%-12.24%32.06%
FJPCX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C
23.89%30.33%6.28%14.73%-23.02%2.12%24.21%24.42%-15.61%28.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PRJPX and FJPCX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2010

0.92

The correlation between PRJPX and FJPCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRJPX vs. FJPCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRJPX
PRJPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PRJPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRJPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRJPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PRJPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRJPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FJPCX
FJPCX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FJPCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FJPCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FJPCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
FJPCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FJPCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) and Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C (FJPCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRJPXFJPCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.23

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

12.26

-6.67

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRJPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the FJPCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRJPX and FJPCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRJPXFJPCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

1.95

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.46

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

0.57

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.40

-0.23

Drawdowns

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRJPX drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than FJPCX's maximum drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRJPX and FJPCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRJPXFJPCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.26%

-36.91%

-31.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.11%

-12.81%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.76%

-19.64%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.42%

-36.91%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.44%

-36.91%

-8.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.09%

-1.66%

-1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.75%

-10.51%

-16.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.72%

3.37%

+1.35%

Volatility

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Japan Fund (PRJPX) is 3.47%, while Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C (FJPCX) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that PRJPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FJPCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRJPXFJPCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.47%

5.05%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.42%

16.37%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.84%

21.21%

-2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

19.97%

-0.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.56%

18.29%

-0.73%

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRJPX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FJPCX's 2.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRJPX vs. FJPCX - Dividend Comparison

PRJPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.17%, more than FJPCX's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FJPCX
Fidelity Advisor Japan Fund Class C
7.40%9.16%3.93%2.96%0.00%10.33%1.25%0.22%0.00%0.25%0.00%0.00%
PRJPX
T. Rowe Price Japan Fund
13.17%14.65%4.82%1.71%6.94%5.42%2.59%2.62%7.56%0.33%0.70%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRJPX and FJPCX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FJPCX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to PRJPX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRJPX dropped -68.26% vs FJPCX's -36.91%.

FJPCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRJPX and FJPCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer