PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIV vs. CTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIV vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIV achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 0.33% return.


PRIV

1D
-0.40%
1M
-0.70%
6M
-0.21%
YTD
-0.04%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTA

1D
2.70%
1M
-5.44%
6M
-2.22%
YTD
0.33%
1Y
-0.10%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIV vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRIV and CTA is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIV vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIV
PRIV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
CTA Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIV vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRIVCTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.02

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

-0.00

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.23

-0.01

+5.25

PRIV vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of -0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIV and CTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRIV vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIV drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIV and CTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIVCTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-20.44%

+17.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-20.44%

+17.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-17.68%

+15.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-5.93%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

6.76%

-5.92%

Volatility

PRIV vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) is 1.34%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that PRIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIVCTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

5.15%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.91%

17.93%

-15.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

20.61%

-16.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.16%

16.63%

-12.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.16%

16.63%

-12.47%

PRIV vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRIV vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

PRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than CTA's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.00%3.19%4.80%7.78%6.58%
PRIV
State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF
4.60%3.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIV and CTA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTA has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PRIV (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRIV dropped -2.75% vs CTA's -20.44%.

On 1-year performance, PRIV leads with 4.38% vs -0.10% for CTA. On fees, PRIV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PRIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRIV has performed better with a 4.38% return vs -0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRIV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.

CTA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.60% for PRIV.

PRIV is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CTA is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PRIV and 0.78% for CTA.

PRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIV and CTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer