PRIV vs. CTA
PRIV (State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF) and CTA (Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRIV is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by State Street, while CTA is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PRIV returned 4.38% vs -0.10% for CTA. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. PRIV charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for CTA.
Performance
PRIV vs. CTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRIV achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 0.33% return.
PRIV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CTA
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- -0.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRIV vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PRIV State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF | -0.04% | 5.07% |
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 0.33% | -3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIV and CTA is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025 | -0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRIV vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank
PRIV
CTA
PRIV vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRIV | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.02 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | -0.00 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | -0.01 | +5.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRIV vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIV drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -20.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIV and CTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRIV | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -20.44% | +17.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.54% | -20.44% | +17.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -17.68% | +15.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.69% | -5.93% | +5.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 6.76% | -5.92% |
Volatility
PRIV vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) is 1.34%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that PRIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRIV | CTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 5.15% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.91% | 17.93% | -15.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 20.61% | -16.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 16.63% | -12.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 16.63% | -12.47% |
PRIV vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRIV vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison
PRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than CTA's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.00% | 3.19% | 4.80% | 7.78% | 6.58% |
PRIV State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF | 4.60% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRIV and CTA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTA has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PRIV (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRIV dropped -2.75% vs CTA's -20.44%.
On 1-year performance, PRIV leads with 4.38% vs -0.10% for CTA. On fees, PRIV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PRIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PRIV has performed better with a 4.38% return vs -0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PRIV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.
CTA has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.60% for PRIV.
PRIV is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CTA is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PRIV and 0.78% for CTA.
PRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRIV and CTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer