PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIV vs. CTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIV vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIV achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's 12.30% return.


PRIV

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.46%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CTA

1D
0.54%
1M
-7.86%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.80%
1Y
15.57%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIV vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRIV and CTA is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

-0.21

The correlation between PRIV and CTA shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIV vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIV
PRIV Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
CTA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIV vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIVCTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.15

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.42

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

3.72

+4.07

PRIV vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIV and CTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIVCTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

0.78

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.62

+0.49

Drawdowns

PRIV vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIV drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum CTA drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIV and CTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIVCTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-18.07%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

-11.00%

+8.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

-7.86%

+6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.66%

-5.67%

+5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

4.19%

-3.41%

Volatility

PRIV vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF (PRIV) is 1.37%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that PRIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIVCTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

7.76%

-6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.68%

17.30%

-14.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

20.12%

-16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.15%

16.58%

-12.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

16.58%

-12.43%

PRIV vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIV has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRIV vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

PRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than CTA's 4.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.85%3.19%4.80%7.78%6.58%
PRIV
State Street IG Public & Private Credit ETF
4.60%3.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIV and CTA have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTA has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to PRIV (1.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRIV dropped -2.75% vs CTA's -18.07%.

On 1-year performance, CTA leads with 15.57% vs 6.08% for PRIV. On fees, PRIV is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PRIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CTA has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PRIV is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.

CTA has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 4.60% for PRIV.

PRIV is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CTA is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PRIV and 0.78% for CTA.

PRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIV and CTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer