PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PRIP.L (Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)) and VCPA.L (Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating) are both Corporate Bonds funds tracking the Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD, from Amundi and Vanguard respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PRIP.L returned 1.54% vs -98.93% for VCPA.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRIP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VCPA.L.

Performance

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

PRIP.L is traded in GBp, while VCPA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VCPA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIP.L achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than VCPA.L's 0.51% return.

PRIP.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: -5.06%
• 1Y: 1.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VCPA.L

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: 1.41%
• YTD: 0.51%
• 6M: 0.27%
• 1Y: -98.93%
• 3Y*: -77.87%
• 5Y*: -59.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PRIP.L Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D)	-0.05%	0.86%
VCPA.L Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating	0.51%	-98.94%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIP.L and VCPA.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025	0.94

The correlation between PRIP.L and VCPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIP.L

PRIP.L Risk / Return Rank: 11
PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
PRIP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
PRIP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 12
PRIP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
PRIP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11

VCPA.L

VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 0
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRIP.L	VCPA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	-1.00	+1.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.34	-0.93	+1.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	0.31	+0.74
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	-1.00	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.37	-1.21	+1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is higher than the VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIP.L and VCPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRIP.L	VCPA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	-1.00	+1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-1.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	-1.24	+1.33

Drawdowns

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIP.L drawdown since its inception was -9.14%, smaller than the maximum VCPA.L drawdown of -99.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIP.L and VCPA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRIP.L	VCPA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.14%	-99.06%	+89.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-99.02%	+89.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-99.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-99.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.78%	-99.03%	+92.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.49%	-17.55%	+14.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.95%	81.78%	-76.83%

Volatility

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi Prime US Corporates UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIP.L) has a higher volatility of 1.68% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) at 1.53%. This indicates that PRIP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRIP.L	VCPA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.68%	1.53%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.61%	4.41%	+2.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.82%	98.63%	-90.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.90%	45.54%	-37.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.90%	40.64%	-32.74%

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VCPA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PRIP.L vs. VCPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRIP.L nor VCPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRIP.L and VCPA.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, PRIP.L and VCPA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, PRIP.L or VCPA.L?

On fees, PRIP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRIP.L or VCPA.L?

PRIP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VCPA.L.

What is the main difference between PRIP.L and VCPA.L?

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIP.L and 0.09% for VCPA.L.