PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PRIJ.L (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) and XCX4.L (Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - PRIJ.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while XCX4.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Thailand NR THB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRIJ.L returned 9.98%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for XCX4.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRIJ.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XCX4.L.

Performance

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIJ.L achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly lower than XCX4.L's 25.44% return.

PRIJ.L

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 8.12%
• YTD: 14.77%
• 1Y: 33.85%
• 3Y*: 16.59%
• 5Y*: 9.98%
• 10Y*: —

XCX4.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -3.30%
• 6M: 22.87%
• YTD: 25.44%
• 1Y: 44.53%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 5.79%
• 10Y*: 3.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRIJ.L Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)	14.77%	17.80%	9.02%	13.78%	-6.35%	2.49%	12.24%	11.21%
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C	25.44%	0.32%	1.51%	-16.15%	15.60%	0.13%	-13.81%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIJ.L and XCX4.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2019	0.36

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PRIJ.L	XCX4.L
Industrials	23.7%	36.9%
Technology	22.5%	-
Financial Services	17.2%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	1.7%
Communication Services	7.9%	12.4%
Healthcare	5.3%	7.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	7.9%
Basic Materials	3.5%	4.2%
Real Estate	2.6%	3.2%
Utilities	1.1%	6.8%
Energy	0.7%	13.6%

Return for Risk

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIJ.L

PRIJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 69
PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PRIJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PRIJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PRIJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PRIJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

XCX4.L

XCX4.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
XCX4.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
XCX4.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
XCX4.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
XCX4.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRIJ.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.09	-0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.85	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	3.90	-0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.59	11.77	-2.18

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIJ.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the XCX4.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIJ.L and XCX4.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIJ.L drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum XCX4.L drawdown of -98.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIJ.L and XCX4.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRIJ.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.45%	-98.74%	+74.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.99%	-11.35%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-28.34%	+15.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.16%	-36.52%	+18.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.80%	-6.80%	+2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.95%	-16.24%	+11.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.77%	-0.25%

Volatility

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIJ.L) is 5.64%, while Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C (XCX4.L) has a volatility of 7.59%. This indicates that PRIJ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCX4.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRIJ.L	XCX4.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	7.59%	-1.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.59%	17.02%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.14%	21.17%	-2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.81%	17.63%	-1.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.65%	2,419.36%	-2,402.71%

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIJ.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XCX4.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRIJ.L vs. XCX4.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIJ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while XCX4.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRIJ.L Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)	1.54%	1.76%	1.89%	1.89%	2.17%	1.81%	1.71%	1.89%
XCX4.L Xtrackers MSCI Thailand UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRIJ.L and XCX4.L in my portfolio?

PRIJ.L and XCX4.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRIJ.L or XCX4.L?

On fees, PRIJ.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRIJ.L or XCX4.L?

PRIJ.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCX4.L.

What is the main difference between PRIJ.L and XCX4.L?

PRIJ.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while XCX4.L is Asia Pacific Equities. PRIJ.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while XCX4.L tracks MSCI Thailand NR THB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIJ.L and 0.50% for XCX4.L.