PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIGX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIGX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRIGX achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than VEA's 13.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PRIGX has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 13.23%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


PRIGX

1D
0.29%
1M
1.96%
YTD
18.31%
6M
17.91%
1Y
42.72%
3Y*
24.06%
5Y*
13.53%
10Y*
13.23%

VEA

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
13.11%
6M
12.98%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
19.47%
5Y*
9.50%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIGX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRIGX
T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund
18.31%31.10%13.34%13.25%-7.86%16.08%11.35%25.56%-13.70%19.57%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
13.11%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIGX and VEA is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2012

0.90

The correlation between PRIGX and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIGX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIGX
PRIGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PRIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIGX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRIGXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.33

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

2.62

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

10.06

+5.46

PRIGX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRIGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is higher than the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRIGX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRIGX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRIGX drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIGX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIGXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.76%

-60.68%

+23.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-11.63%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.18%

-13.45%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.78%

-29.71%

+8.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.76%

-35.73%

-1.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-3.07%

+2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.60%

-13.26%

+8.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

3.02%

-0.23%

Volatility

PRIGX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) is 5.95%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 7.09%. This indicates that PRIGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIGXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

7.09%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

14.74%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

16.79%

-1.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.80%

16.76%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

17.21%

-0.66%

PRIGX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIGX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRIGX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

PRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than VEA's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRIGX
T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund
6.08%7.20%6.53%1.75%0.98%5.81%1.12%2.31%9.08%7.35%2.25%9.12%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.58%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIGX and VEA have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to PRIGX (5.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRIGX dropped -36.76% vs VEA's -60.68%.

PRIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIGX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer