PRIGX vs. GAOAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX).
PRIGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jul 25, 2012. GAOAX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 31, 2011.
Performance
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIGX T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund | 0.29% | 31.10% | 13.34% | 13.25% | -7.86% | 16.08% | 11.35% | 25.56% | -13.70% | 19.57% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | -5.28% | 14.68% | 7.91% | 12.69% | -18.74% | 3.60% | 15.29% | 15.95% | -6.07% | 16.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRIGX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than GAOAX's -5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, PRIGX has outperformed GAOAX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while GAOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.59% annualized return.
PRIGX
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -11.58%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
GAOAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -8.53%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -3.90%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 7.88%
- 5Y*
- 1.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIGX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GAOAX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRIGX vs. GAOAX — Risk / Return Rank
PRIGX
GAOAX
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) and JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRIGX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 0.72 | +0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.06 | +1.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.15 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 0.82 | +1.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.97 | 3.42 | +5.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRIGX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 0.72 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.16 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.52 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.53 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIGX and GAOAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Dividend Comparison
PRIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%, less than GAOAX's 10.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIGX T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund | 7.17% | 7.20% | 6.53% | 1.75% | 0.98% | 5.81% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 9.08% | 7.35% | 2.25% | 9.12% |
GAOAX JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A | 10.19% | 10.15% | 2.34% | 0.00% | 4.62% | 4.61% | 1.54% | 2.43% | 2.52% | 2.95% | 2.59% | 0.96% |
Drawdowns
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIGX drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, which is greater than GAOAX's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIGX and GAOAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRIGX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.76% | -29.02% | -7.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -8.95% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -29.02% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.76% | -29.02% | -7.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.58% | -8.95% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.64% | -6.01% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.15% | +0.72% |
Volatility
PRIGX vs. GAOAX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Value Equity Fund (PRIGX) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund A (GAOAX) at 4.64%. This indicates that PRIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRIGX | GAOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.21% | 4.64% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.81% | 7.42% | +3.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.64% | 11.46% | +5.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 11.02% | +3.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.39% | 10.80% | +5.59% |