PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRIG.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-1.58%
1Y
1.28%
3Y*
-0.67%
5Y*
-2.20%
10Y*

MWRD.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
-0.94%-0.19%-1.79%-1.09%-8.28%-5.90%5.97%6.26%
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%-1.27%17.50%-9.18%24.39%11.85%14.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PRIG.L and MWRD.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019

0.04

The correlation between PRIG.L and MWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.13 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PRIG.L
MWRD.L

Technology

86.2%
24.7%

Healthcare

7.7%
12.4%

Communication Services

3.5%
7.5%

Financial Services

2.6%
14.7%

Basic Materials

-

3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.7%

Energy

-

4.4%

Industrials

-

10.6%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

PRIG.L
86.2%
MWRD.L
24.7%

Healthcare

PRIG.L
7.7%
MWRD.L
12.4%

Communication Services

PRIG.L
3.5%
MWRD.L
7.5%

Financial Services

PRIG.L
2.6%
MWRD.L
14.7%

Basic Materials

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
6.7%

Energy

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
4.4%

Industrials

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
10.6%

Real Estate

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
2.4%

Utilities

PRIG.L

-

MWRD.L
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRIG.L
PRIG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PRIG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRIG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

MWRD.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRIG.LMWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.55

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRIG.LMWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

Drawdowns

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRIG.LMWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

Volatility

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRIG.LMWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRIG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRIG.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, while MWRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
MWRD.L
Amundi Index MSCI World
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRIG.L
Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)
2.99%2.96%2.31%1.97%1.72%1.50%1.75%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRIG.L and MWRD.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for MWRD.L.

PRIG.L is categorized as Global Bonds, while MWRD.L is Global Equities. PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while MWRD.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIG.L and 0.08% for MWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRIG.L and MWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer