PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L
PRIG.L (Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D)) and GLAB.L (SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged) are both Global Bonds funds - PRIG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD while GLAB.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PRIG.L returned -2.20%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for GLAB.L. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRIG.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLAB.L.
Performance
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PRIG.L is traded in GBp, while GLAB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GLAB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRIG.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than GLAB.L's 0.33% return.
PRIG.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- 1.28%
- 3Y*
- -0.67%
- 5Y*
- -2.20%
- 10Y*
- —
GLAB.L
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.19%
- 10Y*
- —
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) | -0.94% | -0.19% | -1.79% | -1.09% | -8.28% | -5.90% | 5.97% | 6.26% |
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 0.33% | 4.68% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -12.07% | -1.74% | 4.48% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRIG.L and GLAB.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2019 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PRIG.L and GLAB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRIG.L
GLAB.L
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
PRIG.L
GLAB.L
Healthcare
PRIG.L
GLAB.L
Communication Services
PRIG.L
GLAB.L
Financial Services
PRIG.L
GLAB.L
Basic Materials
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Consumer Cyclical
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Consumer Defensive
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Energy
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Industrials
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Real Estate
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Utilities
PRIG.L
-
GLAB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRIG.L
GLAB.L
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRIG.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 1.45 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.55 | 4.24 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRIG.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.08 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.31 | 0.04 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.32 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRIG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.02%, which is greater than GLAB.L's maximum drawdown of -15.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRIG.L and GLAB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRIG.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.02% | -15.68% | -10.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.46% | -2.29% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.35% | -3.51% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.03% | -15.45% | -1.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.89% | -1.20% | -22.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.42% | -4.48% | -11.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.31% | 0.78% | +1.53% |
Volatility
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) (PRIG.L) is 1.34%, while SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (GLAB.L) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that PRIG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRIG.L | GLAB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | 1.45% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.53% | 2.50% | +1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.87% | 3.08% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.13% | 4.53% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 3.94% | +3.82% |
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRIG.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than GLAB.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PRIG.L vs. GLAB.L - Dividend Comparison
PRIG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than GLAB.L's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLAB.L SPDR Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged | 3.10% | 3.06% | 2.70% | 1.91% | 1.48% | 1.18% | 1.51% | 1.70% | 0.88% |
PRIG.L Amundi Prime Global Govies UCITS ETF DR (D) | 2.99% | 2.96% | 2.31% | 1.97% | 1.72% | 1.50% | 1.75% | 1.23% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRIG.L and GLAB.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRIG.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRIG.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for GLAB.L.
PRIG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while GLAB.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for PRIG.L and 0.10% for GLAB.L.
Find the right allocation for PRIG.L and GLAB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer