PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGTX vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGTX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a 44.18% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 36.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGTX has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 19.61%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.84% annualized return.


PRGTX

1D
1.35%
1M
20.72%
YTD
44.18%
6M
43.53%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
40.07%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
19.61%

XLK

1D
-1.00%
1M
21.09%
YTD
36.47%
6M
35.71%
1Y
66.93%
3Y*
33.90%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
25.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGTX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
44.18%27.28%33.12%55.92%-55.53%8.85%75.77%34.22%-10.07%47.09%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
36.47%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGTX and XLK is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.88

The correlation between PRGTX and XLK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGTX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGTX
PRGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
PRGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGTX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGTXXLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.57

3.24

+0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.18

3.92

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.52

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.32

4.22

+2.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.93

14.16

+5.77

PRGTX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.57, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGTX and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGTXXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.57

3.24

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.96

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

1.06

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.42

+0.05

Drawdowns

PRGTX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGTXXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.18%

-82.05%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.06%

-15.92%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.67%

-25.66%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.29%

-33.56%

-31.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.29%

-33.56%

-31.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.00%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.54%

-34.96%

+13.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

4.74%

-0.61%

Volatility

PRGTX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.98%. This indicates that PRGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGTXXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

6.98%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.69%

16.68%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.11%

20.82%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.80%

24.90%

+6.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.39%

24.49%

+3.90%

PRGTX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGTX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGTX
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.28%27.71%5.05%0.15%24.67%15.81%9.46%10.03%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PRGTX and XLK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRGTX has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to XLK (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGTX dropped -71.18% vs XLK's -82.05%.

PRGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 3.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGTX and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer