PRGTX vs. PCT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L).
PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000.
Performance
PRGTX vs. PCT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGTX vs. PCT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -7.19% | 27.28% | 33.12% | 55.92% | -55.53% | 8.85% | 75.77% | 34.22% | -10.07% | 47.09% |
PCT.L Polar Capital Technology Trust | 1.74% | 43.19% | 32.06% | 58.46% | -43.56% | 17.28% | 49.79% | 49.42% | -8.40% | 47.10% |
Different Trading Currencies
PRGTX is traded in USD, while PCT.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PCT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a -7.19% return, which is significantly lower than PCT.L's 1.74% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGTX has underperformed PCT.L with an annualized return of 15.10%, while PCT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 22.60% annualized return.
PRGTX
- 1D
- -1.60%
- 1M
- -9.81%
- YTD
- -7.19%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- 32.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
PCT.L
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- 71.04%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 22.60%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGTX vs. PCT.L — Risk / Return Rank
PRGTX
PCT.L
PRGTX vs. PCT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGTX | PCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 2.67 | -1.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.72 | 3.31 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 4.65 | -2.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 18.21 | -11.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGTX | PCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.67 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.58 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.87 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.58 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGTX and PCT.L is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRGTX vs. PCT.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither PRGTX nor PCT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
PCT.L Polar Capital Technology Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRGTX vs. PCT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, which is greater than PCT.L's maximum drawdown of -63.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and PCT.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGTX | PCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.18% | -84.10% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -12.80% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.29% | -37.89% | -27.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.29% | -37.89% | -27.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -8.57% | -4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -30.35% | +8.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.44% | 3.50% | +0.94% |
Volatility
PRGTX vs. PCT.L - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) has a higher volatility of 8.97% compared to Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) at 8.35%. This indicates that PRGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGTX | PCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.97% | 8.35% | +0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.69% | 18.00% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.78% | 26.73% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.74% | 26.70% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 25.97% | +2.20% |