PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PCT.LXLKQ.L
YTD Return12.14%23.59%
1Y Return31.67%38.40%
3Y Return (Ann)4.97%19.43%
5Y Return (Ann)15.53%24.60%
10Y Return (Ann)18.87%23.59%
Sharpe Ratio1.481.85
Daily Std Dev21.12%20.42%
Max Drawdown-84.10%-23.83%
Current Drawdown-15.53%-9.70%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between PCT.L and XLKQ.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PCT.L achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PCT.L has underperformed XLKQ.L with an annualized return of 18.87%, while XLKQ.L has yielded a comparatively higher 23.59% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.47%
11.86%
PCT.L
XLKQ.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) and Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 1.76, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.76
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.29
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 6.49, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.006.49
XLKQ.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.80
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.003.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLKQ.L, currently valued at 10.19, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0010.19

PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which roughly equals the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of PCT.L and XLKQ.L.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.76
2.19
PCT.L
XLKQ.L

Dividends

PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCT.L nor XLKQ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCT.L drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than XLKQ.L's maximum drawdown of -23.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT.L and XLKQ.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-14.14%
-7.90%
PCT.L
XLKQ.L

Volatility

PCT.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Invesco US Technology Sector UCITS ETF (XLKQ.L) at 7.06%. This indicates that PCT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%11.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.63%
7.06%
PCT.L
XLKQ.L