PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PCT.L vs. ATT.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


PCT.LATT.L
YTD Return29.87%29.65%
1Y Return42.80%43.61%
3Y Return (Ann)8.00%2.77%
5Y Return (Ann)18.08%19.55%
10Y Return (Ann)20.22%21.34%
Sharpe Ratio1.871.30
Sortino Ratio2.421.86
Omega Ratio1.321.26
Calmar Ratio1.971.63
Martin Ratio5.544.55
Ulcer Index7.25%8.91%
Daily Std Dev21.46%31.19%
Max Drawdown-84.10%-45.95%
Current Drawdown-2.18%-4.14%

Fundamentals


PCT.LATT.L
Market Cap£4.00B£1.51B
EPS£0.90£1.32
PE Ratio3.742.98
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)£804.99M£520.73M
Gross Profit (TTM)£790.64M£512.82M
EBITDA (TTM)-£6.12M£511.67M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between PCT.L and ATT.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PCT.L having a 29.87% return and ATT.L slightly lower at 29.65%. Over the past 10 years, PCT.L has underperformed ATT.L with an annualized return of 20.22%, while ATT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.03%
8.48%
PCT.L
ATT.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) and Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 1.93, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.93
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 2.48, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.48
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 6.22, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.22
ATT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.37, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.37
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.27
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.42
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 5.16, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.005.16

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the ATT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCT.L and ATT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.93
1.37
PCT.L
ATT.L

Dividends

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCT.L nor ATT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCT.L drawdown since its inception was -84.10%, which is greater than ATT.L's maximum drawdown of -45.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT.L and ATT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.42%
-4.78%
PCT.L
ATT.L

Volatility

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) is 6.97%, while Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that PCT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.97%
7.46%
PCT.L
ATT.L

Financials

PCT.L vs. ATT.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polar Capital Technology Trust and Allianz Technology Trust plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items