PRGTX vs. FIKGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX).
PRGTX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2000. FIKGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | -2.98% | 27.28% | 33.12% | 55.92% | -55.53% | 8.85% | 75.77% | 34.22% | -4.02% |
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 7.52% | 45.43% | 35.88% | 75.75% | -34.81% | 58.07% | 44.21% | 64.45% | -11.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGTX achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than FIKGX's 7.52% return.
PRGTX
- 1D
- 4.55%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -2.98%
- 6M
- -1.87%
- 1Y
- 37.61%
- 3Y*
- 27.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.68%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
FIKGX
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- 7.52%
- 6M
- 14.55%
- 1Y
- 88.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.99%
- 5Y*
- 27.65%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGTX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKGX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGTX vs. FIKGX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGTX
FIKGX
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 2.26 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 2.86 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.40 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 5.22 | -2.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.49 | 19.77 | -11.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.26 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.73 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.85 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGTX and FIKGX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Dividend Comparison
PRGTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIKGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.20%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGTX T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.28% | 27.71% | 5.05% | 0.15% | 24.67% | 15.81% | 9.46% | 10.03% |
FIKGX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z | 6.20% | 6.67% | 0.00% | 3.14% | 3.08% | 4.19% | 4.54% | 1.08% | 19.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGTX drawdown since its inception was -71.18%, which is greater than FIKGX's maximum drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGTX and FIKGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.18% | -45.98% | -25.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -17.09% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.29% | -45.98% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -8.55% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.68% | -10.00% | -11.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 4.51% | -0.04% |
Volatility
PRGTX vs. FIKGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Technology Fund (PRGTX) is 10.21%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class Z (FIKGX) has a volatility of 12.80%. This indicates that PRGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGTX | FIKGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 12.80% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.23% | 25.66% | -7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.07% | 40.19% | -12.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.79% | 38.15% | -6.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.20% | 38.39% | -10.19% |