PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGSX vs. TRRJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 23.78% return, which is significantly higher than TRRJX's 9.32% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGSX has outperformed TRRJX with an annualized return of 16.95%, while TRRJX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


PRGSX

1D
1.03%
1M
10.17%
YTD
23.78%
6M
24.65%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
16.95%

TRRJX

1D
0.39%
1M
3.73%
YTD
9.32%
6M
4.93%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
23.78%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
9.32%10.96%11.99%18.14%-17.96%15.21%17.04%23.72%-6.95%20.89%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGSX and TRRJX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2004

0.93

The correlation between PRGSX and TRRJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGSX vs. TRRJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

TRRJX
TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGSXTRRJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.06

+1.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

7.96

+6.26

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the TRRJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGSX and TRRJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGSXTRRJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

1.59

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.73

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Drawdowns

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than TRRJX's maximum drawdown of -53.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and TRRJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGSXTRRJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.06%

-53.57%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.77%

-8.06%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.13%

-12.52%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

-25.85%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.11%

-30.14%

-7.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.48%

-6.65%

-6.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.11%

2.06%

+1.05%

Volatility

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) at 2.95%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRRJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGSXTRRJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

2.95%

+2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

8.89%

+5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.93%

10.45%

+7.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

12.83%

+6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

13.54%

+6.23%

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TRRJX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGSX vs. TRRJX - Dividend Comparison

PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, while TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
7.76%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%
TRRJX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund
0.00%0.00%2.36%4.68%9.67%6.89%4.80%5.68%8.55%3.80%2.89%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGSX and TRRJX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGSX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to TRRJX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs TRRJX's -53.57%.

PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGSX and TRRJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer