PRGSX vs. TBCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX).
PRGSX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 28, 1995. TBCIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | -6.43% | 21.42% | 16.80% | 25.70% | -28.01% | 9.81% | 52.29% | 35.84% | -4.51% | 32.64% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | -14.54% | 18.94% | 48.73% | 49.61% | -38.48% | 18.30% | 34.90% | 30.30% | 2.13% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a -6.43% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -14.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGSX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 14.22%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.
PRGSX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- -6.43%
- 6M
- -2.35%
- 1Y
- 17.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 5.04%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
TBCIX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGSX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGSX
TBCIX
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGSX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.54 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 0.94 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.13 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 0.50 | +0.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.56 | 1.75 | +2.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGSX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.54 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.44 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.69 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.66 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGSX and TBCIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison
PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.26%, more than TBCIX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 10.26% | 9.60% | 6.73% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 13.67% | 5.67% | 2.21% | 5.81% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.33% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | 6.09% | 5.20% | 18.28% | 3.47% | 5.84% | 10.03% | 1.18% | 0.59% | 2.50% | 3.05% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than TBCIX's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and TBCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGSX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.06% | -43.26% | -20.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.85% | -16.96% | +4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -43.26% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | -43.26% | +5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.77% | -16.96% | +4.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -8.15% | -5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 4.87% | -1.52% |
Volatility
PRGSX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) at 5.58%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGSX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.68% | 5.58% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.04% | 11.76% | +2.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.04% | 22.49% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 23.88% | -4.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 22.69% | -3.08% |