PRGSX vs. RPIDX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) and RPIDX (T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund) are both mutual funds - PRGSX is a Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while RPIDX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 5 years, PRGSX returned 9.83%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for RPIDX. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. PRGSX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for RPIDX.

Performance

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 22.89% return, which is significantly higher than RPIDX's 0.28% return.

PRGSX

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 7.99%
• YTD: 22.89%
• 6M: 23.55%
• 1Y: 42.65%
• 3Y*: 24.23%
• 5Y*: 9.83%
• 10Y*: 16.87%

RPIDX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 0.28%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 7.26%
• 3Y*: 7.70%
• 5Y*: 4.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund	22.89%	21.42%	16.80%	25.70%	-28.01%	9.81%	52.29%	29.56%
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	0.28%	9.74%	9.92%	4.72%	-0.76%	6.21%	2.71%	6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGSX and RPIDX is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2019	-0.00

The correlation between PRGSX and RPIDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.08 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PRGSX vs. RPIDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGSX

PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 67
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

RPIDX

RPIDX Risk / Return Rank: 75
RPIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
RPIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
RPIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
RPIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
RPIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PRGSX	RPIDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.11	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	4.05	-0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.49	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	5.25	-1.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.92	13.84	+0.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the RPIDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGSX and RPIDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRGSX	RPIDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.11	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	1.15	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	1.11	-0.58

Drawdowns

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, which is greater than RPIDX's maximum drawdown of -19.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and RPIDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRGSX	RPIDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.06%	-19.95%	-44.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.77%	-1.34%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.13%	-3.17%	-17.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.11%	-7.31%	-30.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.11%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-0.74%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.48%	-1.87%	-11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	0.51%	+2.60%

Volatility

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund (RPIDX) at 0.65%. This indicates that PRGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RPIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PRGSX	RPIDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	0.65%	+4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.84%	2.56%	+12.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	3.35%	+14.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.66%	3.83%	+15.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.77%	4.80%	+14.97%

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGSX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than RPIDX's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRGSX vs. RPIDX - Dividend Comparison

PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, less than RPIDX's 9.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund	7.81%	9.60%	6.73%	0.27%	0.00%	13.67%	5.67%	2.21%	5.81%	0.03%	0.63%	0.33%
RPIDX T. Rowe Price Dynamic Credit Fund	9.92%	9.91%	9.20%	6.64%	7.97%	5.34%	7.14%	4.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRGSX and RPIDX in my portfolio?

PRGSX and RPIDX have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PRGSX or RPIDX?

PRGSX has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to RPIDX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs RPIDX's -19.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.