PRGSX vs. DXYZ
PRGSX (T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while DXYZ (Destiny Tech100 Inc) is a stock. Over the past year, PRGSX returned 35.76% vs -18.83% for DXYZ. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PRGSX vs. DXYZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGSX achieves a 17.95% return, which is significantly higher than DXYZ's 13.29% return.
PRGSX
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 6M
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 35.76%
- 3Y*
- 22.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 16.59%
DXYZ
- 1D
- -11.55%
- 1M
- -36.45%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 24.60%
- 1Y
- -18.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRGSX vs. DXYZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 17.95% | 21.42% | 4.45% |
DXYZ Destiny Tech100 Inc | 13.29% | -47.96% | 613.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGSX and DXYZ is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRGSX vs. DXYZ — Risk / Return Rank
PRGSX
DXYZ
PRGSX vs. DXYZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) and Destiny Tech100 Inc (DXYZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGSX | DXYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.05 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | -0.37 | +3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | -0.62 | +12.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGSX | DXYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | -0.19 | +2.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
PRGSX vs. DXYZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGSX drawdown since its inception was -64.06%, smaller than the maximum DXYZ drawdown of -90.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGSX and DXYZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGSX | DXYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.06% | -90.35% | +26.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.77% | -51.29% | +38.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -65.23% | +60.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.47% | -68.38% | +54.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 32.66% | -29.51% |
Volatility
PRGSX vs. DXYZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) is 7.79%, while Destiny Tech100 Inc (DXYZ) has a volatility of 58.87%. This indicates that PRGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXYZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRGSX | DXYZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.79% | 58.87% | -51.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.93% | 81.47% | -65.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 98.45% | -79.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 164.90% | -145.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.85% | 164.90% | -145.05% |
Dividends
PRGSX vs. DXYZ - Dividend Comparison
PRGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, while DXYZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXYZ Destiny Tech100 Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PRGSX T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund | 8.14% | 9.60% | 6.73% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 13.67% | 5.67% | 2.21% | 5.81% | 0.03% | 0.63% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRGSX and DXYZ have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DXYZ has higher volatility (58.87%) compared to PRGSX (7.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGSX dropped -64.06% vs DXYZ's -90.35%.
PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRGSX and DXYZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer