PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEAM vs. BKNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TEAM vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEAM achieves a -37.70% return, which is significantly lower than BKNG's -9.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TEAM has underperformed BKNG with an annualized return of 13.16%, while BKNG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.86% annualized return.


TEAM

1D
2.95%
1M
20.49%
6M
-14.52%
YTD
-37.70%
1Y
-44.79%
3Y*
-17.77%
5Y*
-20.85%
10Y*
13.16%
ALL TIME*
12.94%

BKNG

1D
-0.18%
1M
4.52%
6M
-3.12%
YTD
-9.52%
1Y
-9.71%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
17.72%
10Y*
13.86%
ALL TIME*
9.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.08B$1.12B$1.29B
$394.24M$345.64M$494.18M

TEAM vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation
-37.70%-33.38%2.32%84.85%-66.25%63.04%94.34%35.24%95.47%89.04%
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-9.52%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%19.24%-0.88%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TEAM and BKNG is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2015

0.34

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TEAM:

$26.53B

BKNG:

$149.47B

EPS

TEAM:

-$0.82

BKNG:

$7.62

PS Ratio

TEAM:

4.29

BKNG:

5.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAM:

$6.19B

BKNG:

$27.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAM:

$5.20B

BKNG:

$22.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAM:

-$227.46M

BKNG:

$9.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEAM vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TEAM
TEAM Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TEAM vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TEAMBKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.97

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

-0.36

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.16

-0.64

-0.51

TEAM vs. BKNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.70, which is lower than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAM and BKNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TEAM vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEAM drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAM and BKNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEAMBKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.53%

-99.32%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.22%

-32.25%

-36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.30%

-33.35%

-48.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.53%

-39.53%

-48.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.53%

-47.77%

-39.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.95%

-16.38%

-61.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.45%

-46.93%

+16.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.42%

18.10%

+24.32%

Volatility

TEAM vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison

Atlassian Corporation (TEAM) has a higher volatility of 23.98% compared to Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) at 12.74%. This indicates that TEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEAMBKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.98%

12.74%

+11.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.08%

30.84%

+27.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.18%

35.40%

+32.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.06%

32.90%

+28.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.29%

32.58%

+19.71%

Dividends

TEAM vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison

TEAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
0.83%0.72%0.70%
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TEAM vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlassian Corporation and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

TEAM vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atlassian Corporation and Booking Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

TEAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atlassian Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.52B and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.

BKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TEAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atlassian Corporation reported an operating income of -55.27M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

BKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

TEAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Atlassian Corporation reported a net income of -98.39M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of -5.5%.

BKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TEAM and BKNG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEAM has higher volatility (23.98%) compared to BKNG (12.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEAM dropped -87.53% vs BKNG's -99.32%.

BKNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEAM and BKNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer