TEAM vs. ADSK

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK).

Performance

TEAM vs. ADSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TEAM vs. ADSK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TEAM Atlassian Corporation Plc	-57.22%	-33.38%	2.32%	84.85%	-66.25%	63.04%	94.34%	35.24%	95.47%	89.04%
ADSK Autodesk, Inc.	-19.64%	0.15%	21.39%	30.29%	-33.54%	-7.91%	66.43%	42.65%	22.68%	41.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap TEAM : $18.27B ADSK : $50.90B
EPS TEAM : -$0.72 ADSK : $5.23
PS Ratio TEAM : 3.17 ADSK : 7.55
PB Ratio TEAM : 11.49 ADSK : 16.72
Total Revenue (TTM) TEAM : $5.76B ADSK : $6.78B
Gross Profit (TTM) TEAM : $4.81B ADSK : $6.56B
EBITDA (TTM) TEAM : -$92.45M ADSK : $1.68B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEAM achieves a -57.22% return, which is significantly lower than ADSK's -19.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TEAM has underperformed ADSK with an annualized return of 11.34%, while ADSK has yielded a comparatively higher 15.20% annualized return.

TEAM

• 1D: 1.64%
• 1M: -6.00%
• YTD: -57.22%
• 6M: -53.62%
• 1Y: -67.95%
• 3Y*: -26.00%
• 5Y*: -20.83%
• 10Y*: 11.34%

ADSK

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -3.67%
• YTD: -19.64%
• 6M: -24.66%
• 1Y: -10.11%
• 3Y*: 4.55%
• 5Y*: -3.48%
• 10Y*: 15.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

TEAM vs. ADSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAM

TEAM Risk / Return Rank: 2
TEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
TEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ADSK

ADSK Risk / Return Rank: 27
ADSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ADSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
ADSK Omega Ratio Rank: 23
ADSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ADSK Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAM vs. ADSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TEAM	ADSK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.29	-0.33	-0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.39	-0.27	-2.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	0.97	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	-0.28	-0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.90	-0.71	-1.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TEAM vs. ADSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEAM Sharpe Ratio is -1.29, which is lower than the ADSK Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAM and ADSK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TEAM	ADSK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.29	-0.33	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.36	-0.10	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.42	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.33	-0.15

Correlation

The correlation between TEAM and ADSK is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TEAM vs. ADSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEAM nor ADSK has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TEAM vs. ADSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEAM drawdown since its inception was -85.79%, which is greater than ADSK's maximum drawdown of -76.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAM and ADSK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TEAM	ADSK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.79%	-76.92%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-71.67%	-33.09%	-38.58%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-85.79%	-51.99%	-33.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.79%	-51.99%	-33.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.86%	-30.50%	-54.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.82%	-22.59%	-6.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.48%	12.86%	+22.62%

Volatility

TEAM vs. ADSK - Volatility Comparison

Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) has a higher volatility of 15.90% compared to Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) at 8.36%. This indicates that TEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TEAM	ADSK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.90%	8.36%	+7.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.72%	21.97%	+16.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.94%	31.07%	+21.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	57.65%	34.47%	+23.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.88%	36.11%	+13.77%

Financials