PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TEAM vs. ADSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TEAM vs. ADSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TEAM achieves a -37.38% return, which is significantly lower than ADSK's -22.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TEAM having a 15.44% annualized return and ADSK not far behind at 14.69%.


TEAM

1D
-6.94%
1M
8.98%
YTD
-37.38%
6M
-35.23%
1Y
-51.86%
3Y*
-17.96%
5Y*
-14.78%
10Y*
15.44%

ADSK

1D
-2.98%
1M
-7.25%
YTD
-22.44%
6M
-25.27%
1Y
-23.34%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
-4.22%
10Y*
14.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TEAM vs. ADSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TEAM
Atlassian Corporation Plc
-37.38%-33.38%2.32%84.85%-66.25%63.04%94.34%35.24%95.47%89.04%
ADSK
Autodesk, Inc.
-22.44%0.15%21.39%30.29%-33.54%-7.91%66.43%42.65%22.68%41.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TEAM and ADSK is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2015

0.56

The correlation between TEAM and ADSK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TEAM:

$26.66B

ADSK:

$48.68B

EPS

TEAM:

-$0.82

ADSK:

$6.84

PS Ratio

TEAM:

4.31

ADSK:

6.55

PB Ratio

TEAM:

30.33

ADSK:

15.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

TEAM:

$6.19B

ADSK:

$7.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TEAM:

$5.20B

ADSK:

$6.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

TEAM:

-$227.46M

ADSK:

$2.14B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TEAM vs. ADSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TEAM
TEAM Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TEAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEAM Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TEAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEAM Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ADSK
ADSK Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ADSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADSK Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ADSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADSK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TEAM vs. ADSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) and Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TEAMADSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.81

-0.72

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.27

-0.87

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.89

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

-0.71

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-1.37

+0.16

TEAM vs. ADSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TEAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is comparable to the ADSK Sharpe Ratio of -0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TEAM and ADSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TEAMADSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.81

-0.72

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

-0.12

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.40

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Drawdowns

TEAM vs. ADSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TEAM drawdown since its inception was -87.53%, which is greater than ADSK's maximum drawdown of -76.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TEAM and ADSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TEAMADSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.53%

-76.92%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.13%

-33.15%

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.30%

-33.15%

-49.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.53%

-51.99%

-35.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.53%

-51.99%

-35.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.84%

-32.92%

-44.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.70%

-22.62%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.69%

17.01%

+25.68%

Volatility

TEAM vs. ADSK - Volatility Comparison

Atlassian Corporation Plc (TEAM) has a higher volatility of 25.00% compared to Autodesk, Inc. (ADSK) at 12.66%. This indicates that TEAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TEAMADSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.00%

12.66%

+12.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.76%

26.80%

+27.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.02%

32.66%

+31.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.65%

35.08%

+25.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.62%

36.42%

+15.20%

Dividends

TEAM vs. ADSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither TEAM nor ADSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TEAM vs. ADSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Atlassian Corporation Plc and Autodesk, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.79B
1.93B
(TEAM) Total Revenue
(ADSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TEAM vs. ADSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Atlassian Corporation Plc and Autodesk, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%82.0%84.0%86.0%88.0%90.0%92.0%20222023202420252026
85.3%
91.0%
Portfolio components
TEAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 1.52B and revenue of 1.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.3%.

ADSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.76B and revenue of 1.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.

TEAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported an operating income of -55.27M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

ADSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported an operating income of 541.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.0%.

TEAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Atlassian Corporation Plc reported a net income of -98.39M and revenue of 1.79B, resulting in a net margin of -5.5%.

ADSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autodesk, Inc. reported a net income of 491.00M and revenue of 1.93B, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TEAM and ADSK have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TEAM has higher volatility (25.00%) compared to ADSK (12.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TEAM dropped -87.53% vs ADSK's -76.92%.

ADSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TEAM and ADSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer