PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRGMX vs. VGAVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRGMX achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than VGAVX's 1.65% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGMX has underperformed VGAVX with an annualized return of 1.31%, while VGAVX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.70% annualized return.


PRGMX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.33%
1Y
7.89%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
1.31%

VGAVX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.07%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.95%
1Y
11.27%
3Y*
9.73%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRGMX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund
0.93%8.72%1.86%5.62%-11.45%-2.18%4.21%5.18%0.58%1.23%
VGAVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.65%12.98%6.27%10.44%-16.68%-1.74%5.82%14.01%-2.77%8.45%

Correlation

The correlation between PRGMX and VGAVX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.44

The correlation between PRGMX and VGAVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.67 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRGMX vs. VGAVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRGMX
PRGMX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VGAVX
VGAVX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGAVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGAVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGAVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
VGAVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGAVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRGMXVGAVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.58

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.92

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.88

11.71

-2.83

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the VGAVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRGMX and VGAVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRGMXVGAVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.82

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.37

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.58

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.93

0.69

+0.24

Drawdowns

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRGMX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum VGAVX drawdown of -26.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGMX and VGAVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRGMXVGAVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.22%

-26.77%

+8.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.00%

-3.97%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.14%

-7.11%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.30%

-26.77%

+9.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.22%

-26.77%

+8.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.09%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-4.68%

+2.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.99%

-0.10%

Volatility

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VGAVX) at 1.53%. This indicates that PRGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRGMXVGAVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.72%

1.53%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

3.32%

-0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.20%

4.12%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.38%

6.32%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

6.37%

-1.60%

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRGMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VGAVX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRGMX vs. VGAVX - Dividend Comparison

PRGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than VGAVX's 5.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRGMX
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund
4.99%4.96%4.47%3.54%1.38%0.59%1.44%2.39%2.78%2.98%2.88%3.12%
VGAVX
Vanguard Emerging Markets Government Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.79%5.88%6.56%5.50%5.29%4.27%4.20%4.60%4.54%4.62%4.73%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRGMX and VGAVX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGMX has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to VGAVX (1.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRGMX dropped -18.22% vs VGAVX's -26.77%.

VGAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRGMX and VGAVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer