PRGMX vs. TRLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX).
PRGMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Nov 25, 1985. TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001.
Performance
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGMX T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund | 0.87% | 10.46% | 0.92% | 5.62% | -11.45% | -2.18% | 4.21% | 5.18% | 0.58% | 1.23% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -11.46% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 28.51% | 4.35% | 37.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGMX achieves a 0.87% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's -11.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGMX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 1.40%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.72% annualized return.
PRGMX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 4.79%
- 5Y*
- 0.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.40%
TRLGX
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGMX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGMX
TRLGX
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGMX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 0.59 | +1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 1.02 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.14 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.55 | +2.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.77 | 1.83 | +6.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGMX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 0.59 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.43 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.77 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.55 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGMX and TRLGX is -0.09. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison
PRGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than TRLGX's 15.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGMX T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund | 6.90% | 6.52% | 3.54% | 3.54% | 1.38% | 0.59% | 1.44% | 2.39% | 2.78% | 2.98% | 2.88% | 3.12% |
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 15.46% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
Drawdowns
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGMX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGMX and TRLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGMX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -55.56% | +37.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -18.18% | +15.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.70% | -40.44% | +22.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | -40.44% | +22.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -14.94% | +13.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -8.71% | +6.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 5.43% | -4.43% |
Volatility
PRGMX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) is 1.74%, while T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that PRGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGMX | TRLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | 7.19% | -5.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 12.51% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 22.17% | -17.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 22.41% | -16.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 21.73% | -17.00% |