PRGMX vs. TBCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX).
PRGMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Nov 25, 1985. TBCIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGMX T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund | 0.62% | 10.46% | 0.92% | 5.62% | -11.45% | -2.18% | 4.21% | 5.18% | 0.58% | 1.23% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | -14.54% | 18.94% | 48.73% | 49.61% | -38.48% | 18.30% | 34.90% | 30.30% | 2.13% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGMX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -14.54% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGMX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 1.38%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.
PRGMX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 2.89%
- 1Y
- 8.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.69%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
TBCIX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- -14.54%
- 6M
- -12.75%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 15.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRGMX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRGMX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGMX
TBCIX
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGMX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 0.54 | +1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 0.94 | +1.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.13 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 0.50 | +2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.25 | 1.75 | +7.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGMX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 0.54 | +1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.44 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.69 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.66 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGMX and TBCIX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison
PRGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than TBCIX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGMX T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund | 6.91% | 6.52% | 3.54% | 3.54% | 1.38% | 0.59% | 1.44% | 2.39% | 2.78% | 2.98% | 2.88% | 3.12% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | 6.09% | 5.20% | 18.28% | 3.47% | 5.84% | 10.03% | 1.18% | 0.59% | 2.50% | 3.05% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGMX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, smaller than the maximum TBCIX drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGMX and TBCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGMX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -43.26% | +25.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -16.96% | +14.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.70% | -43.26% | +25.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | -43.26% | +25.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.15% | -16.96% | +14.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -8.15% | +5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 4.87% | -3.87% |
Volatility
PRGMX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) is 1.75%, while T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that PRGMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGMX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 5.58% | -3.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.79% | 11.76% | -8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.77% | 22.49% | -17.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 23.88% | -17.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 22.69% | -17.96% |