PRGMX vs. SGINX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX).
PRGMX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Nov 25, 1985. SGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 13, 2000.
Performance
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGMX T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund | 0.99% | 10.46% | 0.92% | 5.62% | -11.45% | -2.18% | 4.21% | 5.18% | 0.58% | 1.23% |
SGINX DWS GNMA Fund | 0.85% | 7.88% | 0.59% | 4.93% | -11.82% | -1.12% | 3.29% | 6.65% | 0.42% | 1.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRGMX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than SGINX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, PRGMX has outperformed SGINX with an annualized return of 1.42%, while SGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.16% annualized return.
PRGMX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 2.76%
- 1Y
- 8.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.83%
- 5Y*
- 0.74%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
SGINX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 5.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.78%
- 5Y*
- 0.09%
- 10Y*
- 1.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PRGMX and SGINX have an expense ratio of 0.58%.
Return for Risk
PRGMX vs. SGINX — Risk / Return Rank
PRGMX
SGINX
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRGMX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.29 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.46 | 1.80 | +0.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.24 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.10 | +0.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.41 | 6.25 | +2.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRGMX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.29 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.01 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.24 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.77 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRGMX and SGINX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Dividend Comparison
PRGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than SGINX's 4.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRGMX T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund | 6.89% | 6.52% | 3.54% | 3.54% | 1.38% | 0.59% | 1.44% | 2.39% | 2.78% | 2.98% | 2.88% | 3.12% |
SGINX DWS GNMA Fund | 4.63% | 3.77% | 3.97% | 3.82% | 1.86% | 1.37% | 2.22% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 3.07% | 2.95% | 3.41% |
Drawdowns
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRGMX drawdown since its inception was -18.22%, roughly equal to the maximum SGINX drawdown of -17.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRGMX and SGINX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRGMX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.22% | -17.37% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.93% | -2.96% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.70% | -17.18% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.22% | -17.37% | -0.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.24% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -1.97% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.99% | +0.02% |
Volatility
PRGMX vs. SGINX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price GNMA Fund (PRGMX) has a higher volatility of 1.75% compared to DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) at 1.41%. This indicates that PRGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRGMX | SGINX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.75% | 1.41% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.41% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.75% | 4.51% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.33% | 6.39% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.73% | 4.78% | -0.05% |