PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFDX vs. PRMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFDX achieves a 11.87% return, which is significantly lower than PRMSX's 32.35% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFDX has outperformed PRMSX with an annualized return of 11.75%, while PRMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.41% annualized return.


PRFDX

1D
0.44%
1M
3.91%
YTD
11.87%
6M
13.88%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.75%

PRMSX

1D
1.22%
1M
12.40%
YTD
32.35%
6M
36.23%
1Y
65.36%
3Y*
19.56%
5Y*
3.10%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
11.87%14.60%11.85%9.75%-3.25%25.60%1.28%33.66%-9.29%15.46%
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
32.35%32.46%-1.72%2.08%-23.35%-10.47%17.63%26.51%-16.20%42.27%

Correlation

The correlation between PRFDX and PRMSX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 1995

0.57

The correlation between PRFDX and PRMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFDX vs. PRMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFDX
PRFDX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PRFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PRMSX
PRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
PRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PRFDXPRMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.64

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

4.82

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.24

19.59

-7.35

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is lower than the PRMSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFDX and PRMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRFDXPRMSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

3.45

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.17

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.45

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.37

+0.24

Drawdowns

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFDX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, smaller than the maximum PRMSX drawdown of -71.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFDX and PRMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFDXPRMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.12%

-71.13%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-13.56%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

-16.47%

+2.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.08%

-43.13%

+25.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.71%

-46.28%

+6.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-21.12%

+14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.33%

-1.37%

Volatility

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) is 2.99%, while T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund (PRMSX) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that PRFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFDXPRMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

8.19%

-5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

16.33%

-8.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.65%

18.97%

-8.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

17.90%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

18.57%

-0.70%

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFDX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than PRMSX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFDX vs. PRMSX - Dividend Comparison

PRFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%, more than PRMSX's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRFDX
T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund
2.44%2.76%8.91%6.19%6.61%8.78%3.55%12.53%11.43%8.97%7.75%7.48%
PRMSX
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock Fund
0.43%0.57%0.35%1.09%1.17%8.26%0.49%1.24%0.61%0.18%0.69%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRFDX and PRMSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRMSX has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to PRFDX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFDX dropped -58.12% vs PRMSX's -71.13%.

PRMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFDX and PRMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer