PRFDX vs. EDEN
PRFDX (T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund) and EDEN (iShares MSCI Denmark ETF) are both funds - PRFDX is a Dividend fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while EDEN is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, PRFDX returned 11.96%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for EDEN. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRFDX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EDEN.
Performance
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFDX achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly higher than EDEN's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PRFDX has outperformed EDEN with an annualized return of 11.96%, while EDEN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.
PRFDX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- 6M
- 13.04%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 11.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.01%
EDEN
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 1Y
- 11.69%
- 3Y*
- 4.23%
- 5Y*
- 2.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $542.51K | $1.19M | $1.06M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFDX T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund | 17.26% | 14.60% | 11.85% | 9.75% | -3.25% | 25.60% | 1.28% | 33.66% | -9.29% | 15.46% |
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 0.71% | 10.58% | -3.94% | 17.99% | -11.47% | 14.81% | 42.56% | 24.37% | -14.43% | 35.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFDX and EDEN is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2012 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PRFDX and EDEN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFDX vs. EDEN — Risk / Return Rank
PRFDX
EDEN
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) and iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRFDX | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.13 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 0.59 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.67 | 1.37 | +12.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFDX drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, which is greater than EDEN's maximum drawdown of -36.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFDX and EDEN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFDX | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.12% | -36.61% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -21.17% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.35% | -29.31% | +14.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.08% | -36.61% | +18.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.71% | -36.61% | -3.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -10.20% | +9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -7.41% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 9.04% | -7.10% |
Volatility
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund (PRFDX) is 2.99%, while iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that PRFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFDX | EDEN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.99% | 5.77% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 15.53% | -7.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.13% | 19.78% | -8.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 20.37% | -5.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.78% | 19.20% | -1.42% |
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFDX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EDEN's 0.53% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFDX vs. EDEN - Dividend Comparison
PRFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EDEN's 3.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 3.04% | 2.79% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% |
PRFDX T. Rowe Price Equity Income Fund | 2.25% | 2.76% | 8.91% | 6.19% | 6.61% | 8.78% | 3.55% | 12.53% | 11.43% | 8.97% | 7.75% | 7.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFDX and EDEN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDEN has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to PRFDX (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFDX dropped -58.12% vs EDEN's -36.61%.
PRFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFDX and EDEN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer