PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRFD vs. QTPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRFD vs. QTPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRFD achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than QTPI's 1.11% return.


PRFD

1D
0.04%
1M
0.83%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.91%
1Y
7.06%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
10Y*

QTPI

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.11%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRFD vs. QTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRFD and QTPI is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRFD vs. QTPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRFD
PRFD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PRFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PRFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRFD Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QTPI
QTPI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QTPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
QTPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRFD vs. QTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRFDQTPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.52

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.82

10.23

-1.41

PRFD vs. QTPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the QTPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRFD and QTPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRFD vs. QTPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRFD drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, which is greater than QTPI's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFD and QTPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRFDQTPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.93%

-4.08%

-7.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-2.11%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.41%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-0.40%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.52%

+0.28%

Volatility

PRFD vs. QTPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) is 0.73%, while North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) has a volatility of 1.35%. This indicates that PRFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRFDQTPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

1.35%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

3.25%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.18%

4.13%

-0.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.85%

4.96%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

4.96%

-0.11%

PRFD vs. QTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRFD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QTPI's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRFD vs. QTPI - Dividend Comparison

PRFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than QTPI's 4.43% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


PRFD and QTPI have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTPI has higher volatility (1.35%) compared to PRFD (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFD dropped -11.93% vs QTPI's -4.08%.

On 1-year performance, PRFD leads with 7.06% vs 5.30% for QTPI. On fees, QTPI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PRFD has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PRFD has performed better with a 7.06% return vs 5.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTPI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for PRFD.

PRFD has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 4.43% for QTPI.

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and North Square. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PRFD and 0.60% for QTPI.

PRFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRFD and QTPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer