PRFD vs. PFFV
PRFD (PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund) and PFFV (Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PRFD is actively managed, while PFFV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PRFD returned 9.23%/yr vs 7.51%/yr for PFFV. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PRFD charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PFFV.
Performance
PRFD vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRFD achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than PFFV's 2.93% return.
PRFD
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFV
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- 1Y
- 5.19%
- 3Y*
- 7.51%
- 5Y*
- 2.24%
- 10Y*
- —
PRFD vs. PFFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PRFD PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 1.40% | 8.45% | 9.92% | 1.83% |
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 2.93% | 2.08% | 9.45% | 4.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRFD and PFFV is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2023 | 0.44 |
PRFD vs. PFFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PRFD
PFFV
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PRFD
PFFV
Communication Services
PRFD
PFFV
-
Basic Materials
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Consumer Cyclical
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Consumer Defensive
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Energy
PRFD
-
PFFV
Healthcare
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Industrials
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Real Estate
PRFD
-
PFFV
Technology
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Utilities
PRFD
-
PFFV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRFD vs. PFFV — Risk / Return Rank
PRFD
PFFV
PRFD vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRFD | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 1.27 | +1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.51 | 1.88 | +1.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.23 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.46 | 1.61 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.14 | 4.52 | +5.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRFD | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 1.27 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.56 | +0.75 |
Drawdowns
PRFD vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRFD drawdown since its inception was -11.93%, smaller than the maximum PFFV drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRFD and PFFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRFD | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -18.96% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.28% | -3.23% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.28% | -6.07% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.31% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -4.18% | +1.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.79% | 1.15% | -0.36% |
Volatility
PRFD vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PRFD) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) at 0.79%. This indicates that PRFD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRFD | PFFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | 0.79% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.68% | 2.84% | -0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 4.12% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 8.84% | -3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 8.69% | -3.81% |
PRFD vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRFD has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRFD vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison
PRFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than PFFV's 8.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFV Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 8.12% | 8.26% | 7.33% | 7.17% | 6.60% | 5.23% | 2.29% |
PRFD PIMCO Preferred And Capital Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 5.77% | 5.63% | 5.53% | 5.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRFD and PFFV have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PRFD has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to PFFV (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRFD dropped -11.93% vs PFFV's -18.96%.
On 3-year performance, PRFD leads with 9.23% vs 7.51% for PFFV. On fees, PFFV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PFFV has been the lower-risk option at 0.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PRFD has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 7.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for PRFD.
PFFV has the higher dividend yield at 8.12%, compared with 5.77% for PRFD.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for PRFD and 0.25% for PFFV.
PRFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PRFD and PFFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer