PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO
PREF.TO (Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF) and HPR.TO (Global X Active Preferred Share ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PREF.TO returned 6.02% vs 14.89% for HPR.TO. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PREF.TO achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly lower than HPR.TO's 6.60% return.
PREF.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 6.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- YTD
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 7.98%
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PREF.TO Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF | 3.18% | 6.77% | 9.28% |
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 6.60% | 17.78% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between PREF.TO and HPR.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2024 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PREF.TO
HPR.TO
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF (PREF.TO) and Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PREF.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.78 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.02 | 6.73 | -2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 34.62 | -25.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PREF.TO drawdown since its inception was -6.24%, smaller than the maximum HPR.TO drawdown of -45.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PREF.TO and HPR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PREF.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.24% | -45.02% | +38.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.50% | -2.22% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.75% | -6.15% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | 0.43% | +0.20% |
Volatility
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO - Volatility Comparison
Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF (PREF.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to Global X Active Preferred Share ETF (HPR.TO) at 0.85%. This indicates that PREF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PREF.TO | HPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.23% | 0.85% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.90% | 2.65% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 4.09% | -0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 8.43% | -3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 11.76% | -6.56% |
Dividends
PREF.TO vs. HPR.TO - Dividend Comparison
PREF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than HPR.TO's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HPR.TO Global X Active Preferred Share ETF | 4.72% | 4.34% | 4.28% | 5.56% | 5.96% | 4.01% | 5.11% | 4.87% | 4.39% | 3.88% | 4.32% | 4.60% |
PREF.TO Quadravest Preferred Split Share ETF | 6.61% | 6.60% | 3.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PREF.TO and HPR.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Quadravest and Global X.
Find the right allocation for PREF.TO and HPR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer