PRDSX vs. FFFLX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX).
PRDSX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1997. FFFLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 1, 2006.
Performance
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDSX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund | -4.64% | 17.44% | 12.97% | 21.15% | -22.49% | 11.15% | 23.85% | 32.75% | -6.91% | 22.12% |
FFFLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A | -3.95% | 22.73% | 13.41% | 18.92% | -18.34% | 15.79% | 17.25% | 26.29% | -8.46% | 21.36% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRDSX achieves a -4.64% return, which is significantly lower than FFFLX's -3.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PRDSX having a 10.82% annualized return and FFFLX not far behind at 10.36%.
PRDSX
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- YTD
- -4.64%
- 6M
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
FFFLX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -9.19%
- YTD
- -3.95%
- 6M
- -0.88%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRDSX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFLX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRDSX vs. FFFLX — Risk / Return Rank
PRDSX
FFFLX
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) and Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRDSX | FFFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.93 | 1.10 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.58 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.56 | 6.13 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRDSX | FFFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.10 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.50 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.68 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.40 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRDSX and FFFLX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Dividend Comparison
PRDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.31%, more than FFFLX's 6.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRDSX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund | 13.31% | 12.70% | 7.96% | 2.43% | 3.72% | 13.97% | 2.91% | 4.12% | 4.53% | 0.10% | 0.02% | 1.83% |
FFFLX Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A | 6.11% | 5.87% | 1.42% | 1.25% | 10.58% | 9.34% | 5.18% | 6.72% | 11.39% | 4.24% | 4.52% | 3.69% |
Drawdowns
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRDSX drawdown since its inception was -58.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FFFLX drawdown of -58.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRDSX and FFFLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRDSX | FFFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.95% | -58.29% | -0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.24% | -11.09% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.17% | -27.47% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.61% | -31.22% | -6.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.08% | -9.79% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.23% | -9.19% | -5.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 2.52% | +0.90% |
Volatility
PRDSX vs. FFFLX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small-Cap Growth Equity Fund (PRDSX) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) at 5.59%. This indicates that PRDSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRDSX | FFFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 5.59% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.20% | 9.44% | +5.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.29% | 15.76% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.36% | 14.79% | +6.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 15.38% | +6.08% |